From the inception of our country, its citizens have held certain beliefs and understandings in common, which have served as the foundational bedrock of our American civil contract. These understandings are rooted in our original Judeo/Christian ethic, namely that there is a God above us, that he is benevolent and merciful, and that he in his wisdom has laid down certain tenets and laws in order to guarantee our happiness and social prosperity, and that if followed, these tenets and laws would ensure our established and continued freedoms. Even non-religious Americans have traditionally subscribed to this common understanding—that there are principles of moral law and justice that if adhered to as a society will ensure that society’s peaceful social cohesion.
The original and longstanding practiced tenet of justice within the Judeo/Christian experience was described originally over 2,000 ago in the chronicles of the Bible. To love justice, and to do justice, was written of as a primary virtue, one which ensured the continued safety and happiness of all those to whom it was accorded. Justice was defined as the forced stoppage of a committed wrong against an individual or group of individuals—said wrong being defined by the commandments—and punishment for the unjust offenders, with the assurance that the injustice would not be allowed to continue. The application of traditional justice is what in essence ensures the actual peaceful coexistence of any society, by extending and ensuring the benefits of the moral law written to protect society’s wellbeing. This commitment to moral principles and justice is what allowed the extension of the broad individual rights and freedoms codified in the American Constitution. A population committed to shared moral principles, and to the application of traditional justice to ensure the safety of the citizenry and the continuance of these moral principles, was one who could be trusted with this novel and expansive new set of freedoms.
With the Judeo/Christian ethic firmly established in their minds through the religious beliefs of the original American citizens and their leaders, justice and individual rights were the primary focus of the organization of American society, and in particular of the American Constitution. These base tenets and laws have served as the bulwark of our internal peace for going on 250 years. The American Constitution, which grew out of the Judeo/Christian experience of our original citizens, codified the rights that could be safely given to a society that lived in respect for these philosophical tenets and laws.
Unfortunately, these tenets and laws, and the very nature of justice that springs from them, are under sustained assault in today’s America. There are specific forces at work attempting to undermine our long standing traditional moral tenets and laws, to replace them with new versions invented by men, and to reverse the traditional meaning of justice in our society. To those attempting this revolution, their definition of justice is diametrically opposed to the long standing and traditional definition—that just treatment is meted out in accordance with a set of just and loving commandments—that committing murder is unjust and must be sanctioned—that bearing false witness against your neighbor is unjust and must be sanctioned—that stealing your neighbor’s property is unjust and must be sanctioned. But to the communist all these moral interpretations are relatively meaningless, and only of secondary and occasional importance. They hold to a different standard of morality and justice—that the struggle for equal economic outcome of all citizens is the absolute standard of morality, and that any other outcome is unjust, and constitutes a violation of their re-defined standard of justice.
Since the original meaning of justice, and the original code of ethics upon which it is built, is religious in nature and origin, communist thought therefore is inherently and diametrically opposed to religion and the concept of God. This is confirmed not only philosophically, but by the actions of every communist regime throughout history. During the reign of the Soviet Union, the Soviet Communists razed 50,000 churches, and drove the religious community underground. The church then had to meet in secret, and was subject to constant persecution and the threat of arrest. In the five years following the Bolshevik Revolution, 28 bishops and 1,200 priests were murdered by the regime. In China today, the communist regime closes active churches and persecutes their pastors. The hatred of the traditional Christian religion by all communists is inherent in their contrary interpretations of moral law and justice, and in their aggressive and violent attempts to destroy Christianity itself and its original form of societal justice. Karl Marx, who along with Fredrick Engels first defined communist theory, declared religion “an enemy of the people,” while the first leader of the Soviet Union Vladimir Lenin, stated: “religion and communism are incompatible in theory as well as practice. We must fight religion.”
In today’s America, a weakening of the long held meaning of justice is moving us towards adopting the communist interpretation, putting us in massive danger of losing the traditions and tenets that have held up our society and constitutional form of government for over two centuries. Without these supportive structures our traditional society will most certainly fall. Only an all out push with full resolve to crush these subversive attempts will suffice in the later stages of the revolution we find ourselves in. Our society is under sustained attack. We must awaken fully and fight back with whatever means necessary as defeat would prove to be catastrophic, signifying the end or our lives and our country as we have known them. And many of us would then most assuredly lose our lives at the hands of our communist enemies, as they then turn their attention to retribution.
Imagine a dinner party on the deck of a fine home overlooking the ocean. High above the water, the wine flowed and the conversation was stimulating and interesting. Then one party goer asked everyone to please be quiet for a moment, because he thought he heard a strange noise coming from the basement of the home. As silence ensued, a sawing or hacking sound could be heard emanating from the basement. Three men then went down to the basement to investigate, and found two men busily working, sawing through the massive support pillars in a slow, methodical manner. Hardly looking up from their work, as they sensed no danger from the three men, they continued their slow hard work. The men who had gone to investigate knew what the consequences were of the work, but in their amazed stupor, simply returned to the party, ignoring the sure knowledge that the large deck, holding sixty five inhabitants, and indeed the entire home, was soon to plunge over the cliff into the ocean below, surely killing all the inhabitants. Should this reaction by the three men not serve as the new definition of insanity? They had the numerical advantage, and the ability to overcome the two men, but declined to do so, putting sixty five celebrants in imminent danger of violent death.
What sane man would not rush to detain the men at work destroying the pillars that held up the lives of so many in sure safety, forcefully stopping the work, and then should the two men fight back, not counterattack with full force to save the lives of so many?
Yet this is the exact case in today’s America. We have hard leftists at work sawing and hacking away at the foundations of our society and form of government, with the full intent of seeing it fall. And make no mistake, as can be easily deduced by studying the consequences of historical hard leftists revolutions—many millions will be imprisoned, and millions will be killed. Will we be any less to blame than the three men who had overwhelming force in the basement in their favor, and yet in their disbelief at what was transpiring, and refusal to understand the certain results, neglected to come to their senses, exercise courage, and save their countrymen?
I will ask you the one seminal question upon which the future of our beloved country depends—do you have a working semi-automatic rifle, and 1,000 rounds of ammunition, and do you stand ready to utilize them in defense of your country? If not, simply return to the party and await the inevitable. You have effectively chosen not to prepare to finally stand in her defense. It will prove to be insufficient to ask an enemy in control of virtually all the levels of government, media, academia, and entertainment to “please stop.” It will also do no good to try to organize politically at this latter stage of their revolution. They have amassed tremendous power as we slept, down to the very control of our communication mediums and election methods and machinery, effectively silencing our voices and stealing our vote, and have shown certainly that they have no intention to do anything else than to finish their demonic work currently unopposed.
Welcome to the party that is now our America! Consider your position carefully, as your decision will add its weight to the developing conservative mind that may provide the national salvation and renewal so sorely needed—or instead add its weight to the currently dominant hard leftist form of American destruction.
American Renewal