american_flag_879fd33b-502a-48db-a5b9-c6449a86f541

American Renewal 2

Mission Statement
The mission of American Renewal is to provide a cultural and political platform to return the American populace and government to a strictly pro-American, pro-capitalist, Judeo-Christian ideals based society as our country was founded, and to strict constitutional rule, with its protections of comprehensive individual natural rights for her loyal citizens as intended originally by the document’s authors.

We seek not to be solely a philosophical organization, but also an organized civilian force able to defend against egregious government affronts to our rights and liberties. If ultimately unable to thwart these abuses, we seek to be a force then able to accomplish a hard reset of American society and government.

No society can long retain the favor and protection of God while involved in the mass slaughter of its unborn and the neglect to the point of death of its recently born, the promotion of the open practice of homosexuality and the codification of homosexual unions, the erasure of gender assignments set in place by nature and nature’s God, and the attempt to institute the subjugation of its citizens and the stripping of their constitutional rights under a totalitarian socialist construct. This is not what America was founded to be, according to her founders and their founding documents and attendant writings, and is therefore not what the majority of us have pledged our allegiance to.

A new course of action is needed to ensure America’s moral, social, and civic prosperity, and the following measures are formulated to accomplish that in short order. These positions and actions represent an effective and robust counter-revolution to the current Marxist revolution taking place in America.

The Attempted Coup

In 2016, a group of British and American leftists hatched a plan to abrogate a certified American presidential election. They concocted false information and then filed false FISA applications with this information, which they clearly knew to be full of lies, in their effort to illicitly surveil, smear, and then attempt the take down of a duly elected American president who was intent on renewing our great country to the best of his understanding. They in essence circumvented our democratic process in order to substitute their personally desired subversive political outcomes for the legitimate outcome of a democratic election, and positioned themselves as traitors to our long standing traditions and institutions.

Post Coup

These anti-American subversives are still active in their treason against America, and must be rooted out of our system and punished legally. This could not have and did not happen under the tenure of then Attorney General William Barr, and must be accomplished outside of any such present or future subverted administrative state apparatus.

Unfortunately for America under President Trump, he was not in the beginning sufficiently educated as to the philosophical alignments of those in government who opposed him unbeknownst. He kept naively appointing them, and they kept opposing and thwarting his agenda. He naively listened to his health czars, unaware of their conflicting political, philosophical, and financial interests, who then lied to him and persuaded him to institute Operation Warp Speed, the development of a Covid vaccine invented by the political and scientific class who actually inflicted the pandemic on the American public. He allowed the hard left to subvert an American national election, and was then as a result forced to step aside.

Trump is a brilliant businessman and executive, and he clearly loves his country. Either his re-entry into the presidency, or the entry of another equally committed and patriotic candidate, will be a positive turn of events. But a far more concise understanding by our political leaders of our hard left political enemies and their tactics, and a more concise and consistent set of intentions and strategies are called for if we are to succeed in the long run.

The Great Steal

In the 2020 presidential election, hard leftists in the Democratic Party colluded with worldwide socialists and communist regimes to falsify an American presidential election, effectively nullifying the votes of up to 80 million Trump supporters, stripping conservative Americans of their right to be equally represented in our democracy. In typical Machiavellian fashion—with “the ends justifying the means”—they lied, cheated, and conspired to further their revolution at the expense of American democracy, and in support of foreign regimes and their antithetical ways of life and forms of government.

This is an act of treason and one committed by a clear enemy—these involved are no longer our countrymen, having crossed a line removing themselves from the status of patriotic Americans supportive of our original representative republic. It is understood that not every Democrat knows about this attack or would support it, but at the very least the party leadership and the hard left media establishment supporting them know full well what they have done, and have ceased to be our countrymen at heart, having entered into a position of treason against the founding principles and constitution of our republic.

Conservative leaders like Thomas Sowell, Rush Limbaugh, Trevor Loudon, Jeff Nyquist, Diana West etc. have done a tremendous job educating the public as to the threat from the hard left, but have been at a loss to offer any concrete comprehensive solutions that can effectively reverse this current latter stage Marxist revolution in our country.

It is time to build on and improve on the methods of President Trump and our well loved conservative leaders, to gather their followers in our common cause, and  through intellectual force and wise decision making, taking into actual account the philosophical leanings of all involved in government and society, to weed out those subversive to our founding principles, and to move on with our renewed American experience in clean and complete victory.

American Renewal—Our People

As the seeds of the American experience were originally sown in the hearts of English settlers who resettled in America, and continued through the entry of other European immigrants in America’s early years, and since political culture is primarily extended through familial social culture as families pass on traditions and mores until they become embedded and common throughout their extended culture—the majority of our members may naturally be white.  We feel no shame at all in this of course—those of us who are white are proud of who we are as a people, and of our unmatched contributions to the origination and success of the American republic.

We welcome though into our midst people of all races and cultures that support the tenets of American Renewal, knowing well that political and civic culture can also be adopted voluntarily and extended outside of original cultural and familial channels.  All Americans can choose to adopt and support our beliefs regardless of race and ethnicity. The majority of us may well be white—as is natural in a country where whites are in the majority—but many members will come from other racial and ethnic groups, and we welcome them if they share our common philosophical bond.

American Renewal-The Primacy of Faith

The American experience was founded and rooted in the precepts of the Judeo-Christian understanding—namely that nature’s God endowed us with inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and that only lives lived in general adherence to the Ten Commandments and the tenets of this ethos could form the foundation of a successful democratic republic in America.

We therefore are in the main a religious community, though we also acknowledge that those without belief and those of differing beliefs can also adhere to the principles of American Renewal, and therefore we are open to and accepting into our midst those of either no faith, or of differing faiths, as long as they respect the tenets of our organization and the established religious foundations of the American experience.

We do not believe that there is a right of government to compel a citizen to adopt any religion—the free agency of human beings is a given. But there of course is a right of any decent society through law and government to compel its citizens to follow principles relative to the protection of the safety and security of a society’s fellow citizens, and to the furtherance and health of their society. These protective moral and legal precepts emanate from the Judeo-Christian ethos, having been written by nature’s God, who created us and who knows best how his creation should function. These precepts are generally set forth in the Ten Commandments and the philosophical basis of the Bible, and will be vigorously promoted by law. Our second American president and Founding Father John Adams said it well: “Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” And by religion, he was clearly referring to the dominant Judeo-Christian religion of his time and the following of its moral tenets. Those who adhere to the Judeo-Christian religious ethos, and those who do not practice this religious way, but respect it as the foundation on which our society is built, will be our members.

Antonio Gramsci And The Attempted Destruction Of America

American hard leftists, steeped in the posthumous application of the political philosophy of Italian communist Antonio Gramsci, teach those on the left that the way to break down and destroy the American Republic is to separate her citizens from God and traditional religion, in order to facilitate a spiritual unmooring, and ultimately the final shift of their upward gaze and attachment from God and religious devotion to the godless totalitarian socialist state. They know that our traditional religious tenets are what make us strong and resistant to revolution and to this shift of our gaze and devotion, and therefore seek the degradation and eventual destruction of these tenets, beliefs, and associations.

Our Requisite And Commensurate Response

We will make great efforts to renew and strengthen these American tenets and beliefs. As in any physical tug of war, those who pull straight back against the opposing team with full force are the ones most likely to prevail. Hard leftists seek to break down the church and her precepts, knowing them to be the bulwark on which our republic stands. In order to pull straight back against them, we must not adopt any of their destructive precepts, but instead cling steadfastly and tenaciously to the exact traditional beliefs and realities that they seek to attack and destroy.

We should have always served as a bulwark against their cultural destruction by virtue of our strong conviction and commitment, but unfortunately we now must look to what they seek to destroy in order to see and comprehend what actually to preserve. Jesus himself said “you are the salt of the earth. But if the salt has lost its savour, wherewith shall it be salted? It is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under the foot of men.” This is a great shame on our nation’s religious community—that we no longer have provided the salt necessary to preserve the moral and ethical soundness of our society.

We should have known and acted forcefully to defend and promote our developed culture and the moral tenets undergirding our civilization. But instead we let ourselves be culturally overrun, paying attention to not much else than to the development and maintenance of our careers and families, as if these values did not exist in a potentially shifting cultural and political milieu subject to degradation and ultimate destruction, but instead were perpetually safe and secure in stone regardless of radically shifting politics, and for some reason we assumed yet never defined, could not be degraded and destroyed.

When the hard left sought to legitimize homosexual marriage—we should have focused a clear light on the destructive effects on society of this practice, it’s biblically prohibited status, and rejected such a reclassification of marriage, and fought against it with full force. But we did nothing, accepting the induced shame from the left, who painted us as bigots against the purported civil rights status of a particular group, as if the sexual practice choices of this group were genetically programmed and therefore immutable—as if rendering judgement against this aberration was therefore unjustified and moot.

We must also reverse course relative to accepting homosexuality into our society as a norm. We must again become the salt of the earth, and in this light we must be willing to defend as well the lives of the innocent young in the womb with our own, effectively erasing this murderous moral scourge from our land.

When the hard left now seeks to break down traditional gender norms, declaring that individuals originally assigned at conception their gender by nature and nature’s God are now suddenly free to choose to deny this assignment of nature and select another at random—we must now never give an inch—we must reject this obvious affront to the norms that keep us strong as a nation and people, and fight with full force to deny the destructive societal change they seek through this cultural attack.

There may come a time when our only option to turn back attempts to strip us of our constitutional rights and completely degrade our society morally and politically will be the use of our personal weapons in the aggregate. Each patriotic traditional American must be open to the future possibility of pushing back with every means available to prevent the destruction of our great nation and the freedoms it embodies, and to prevent the legal and political oppression that they intend for us. But in the interim, we must at a minimum become much more militant, matching and then exceeding the psychological energy of the hard left in this societal tug of war. Should we refuse our responsibility in this regard, history will judge us as those who gave up the greatest nation in the history of mankind because of our slothfulness and self-indulgence. The history books would then state that it was given away without a whimper on our watch, relegating us to the status of the historically accursed.

It is time for American patriots to rise up and meet the challenge that falls on us at this historic juncture. Our fathers and grandfathers fought the Nazis and prevented the tyranny they sought to inflict on the world. Can we expect that we should need to pay no similar or greater price to protect our nation in today’s troubling and dangerous times, as we are under attack by the worldwide communist movement and its members in American government and society? The conflict facing us today is of vastly greater importance than their struggle, as it entails the fight for the survival and renewal of the greatest world counterbalance to totalitarian regimes and their slaughters in the history of the world, and for the survival of an American culture and polity fashioned on eternal principles. America is the only bulwark of freedom capable of preventing the slide of the entire world into a brutal totalitarianism and the great attendant slaughter that would ensue without effective defense.

It is our time—let us rise up and claim the future for freedom, liberty, and ultimately for the victory of righteousness. We must create a movement that is completely committed to traditional American ideals, one that is more committed and determined than our globalist communist enemies, one that will pull straight back with great and determined force in this historical tug of war, dragging our enemies through the mud against their wills to their total defeat.

Means of renewal:

Eliminate Abortion

Immediately institute a federal prohibition against abortion in any circumstance, except the most extremely rare case where necessary to protect the mother when both mother and child are sure to die in the throes of birth.

Should the mother have a pre-existing condition that makes pregnancy risky for her health, she should act sufficiently responsibly to ensure that she does not become pregnant. There are multiple means to easily accomplish this end. Having neglected to do so does not effectively strip the infant of his/her constitutional rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It simply means that the mother has placed herself in unnecessary and avoidable risk.

Instances of the impregnation of a potential mother by a rapist do not remove from the infant his/her right to life, but should indeed subject the rapist father to a long sentence in prison, where all his paid labor while there goes to the subsistence of the mother and child. When he is released, the shortfall of his contributions must be regularly garnished from his wages to go towards the benefit of the mother, as she was forced to suffer because of his deed, and bore the responsibility of single parenthood and all of its financial hardships. Charitable support must also be aggressively promoted to fill the financial shortfall in support of such a mother and child, while the father is incarcerated, until the child reaches 18 years of age.

Murdering the unborn is not a civil right in any of the above cases, unless both mother and child are certain to die, leaving available only one morally justified decision—to save the greatest number of lives.

Abortion is in essence the denying of the most basic civil right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to these emerging and entirely vulnerable American citizens. Attacking and abusing these potential future American citizens weakens America morally, and submerges her in a milieu of evil. Abortion and the subsequent decline of our national population growth also increase inward immigration pressure to meet our resultant unmet labor demands, in order to augment our diminished national population and labor force, eventually altering the developed character, culture, and polity of our nation.

Nothing can be accomplished until the moral center of this nation is recovered, and the slaughter of the unborn brought to a halt. 60,000,000 American children have been slaughtered in the womb since the Roe Vs. Wade decision incorrectly interpreted the existence of an unintended and nonexistent constitutional right to murder a child, making such murder a private matter for a woman to decide and then hire out. If these potential American citizens were alive today, there would be no need for the importation of foreign labor, nor for the national guilt that we suffer under, and all these murdered American citizens would be living their God given lives freely among us today. The heinous murder of the innocent and completely vulnerable unborn must be brought to an end.

We must regain our soul and conscience relative to the treatment of our most vulnerable emerging citizens. We must protect their right to life and their pursuit of happiness, and at the cost of our lives in their defense if necessary. The reversal of Roe vs. Wade has not been sufficiently effective in this regard, as abortion is still readily available across state lines, and has only declined slightly nationwide. It must be completely eliminated from our national midst. It is not sufficient to rest in the knowledge that children cannot be murdered in some states, when they can still be murdered in other states in our national union, and that women are able to simply cross state lines to another civil polity should their state not allow abortion. If we are to reclaim America’s soul, we must drive this scourge from our national midst entirely.

 “Any society, any nation, is judged on the basis of how it treats its weakest members ; the last, the least, the littlest.”

Cardinal Roger Mahoney

Ban and Nullify Homosexual Marriage

The reversal of the national codification of this unnatural practice, and the reconstitution of sodomy laws, will be a powerful first step in reestablishing traditional sexual norms in our society. Our founding society was not at all involved in the support nor defense of homosexuality—it was a deviancy not common nor allowed to be freely practiced in early America. It was considered, and still in reality is, an affront to nature and nature’s God.

Practicing homosexuality is not a civil right, as it is a debased moral choice that tears at the fabric of civic society, weakens our national character, and reduces our national birth rate, leading again to the need for excessive immigration into America in order to meet the demands of an expanding economy and its labor force demands.

Had sodomy laws been in place and enforced at the introduction to the U.S. of the AIDS epidemic, the rampant sexual contact between homosexuals in the bath houses of San Francisco that fueled the rapid spread of the virus would have been prevented by police under law closing down the bathhouses that homosexuals frequented and where they openly practiced homosexuality, thus greatly diminishing this dangerous activity and the initial spread of the disease, which when left unchecked then subsequently gained a deadly foothold in American society. Subsequently an effective quarantine of those already infected would have well protected the remainder of our citizenry, greatly reducing the loss of life. The failure to take these wise steps ultimately cost the lives of 700,000 American citizens, which defines such failure as an effective evil to be rethought, redefined, and rejected.

President Trump sought the elimination of sodomy laws worldwide through the application of political pressure on African countries and their traditional cultures. Much as we supported the general efforts of President Trump in his general attempt to reclaim American society, in this instance we strongly disagree. Countries that prohibit actions and lifestyles that degrade and endanger society are wise, and wisdom is what is called for, to ensure both the renewal of our great country and the general welfare of the entire world. Homosexual practices are a moral choice, not actions genetically predetermined, or they could not be condemned by a just God as they are in the biblical texts. Accepting the faulty premise that this lifestyle choice is genetically programmed and therefore cannot be judged by nature and nature’s God, and subsequently by the legal systems of human society, is inconsistent with the revelations of our Judeo-Christian religious teachings.

The human mind is a deep and complex pool, with considerations at work sometimes below our conscious awareness. As a person devoid of close and necessary attachment to one of their parents is acutely and painfully aware of this lack, it sets about a futile subconscious striving to fulfill this unrealized primal need, resulting in un-natural human attractions. When a person seeks its fulfillment out of historical and natural context, rejecting the reality that the opportunity for fulfillment has been lost forever and must be deeply grieved and then abandoned, many different potential false fulfillments can present themselves as solutions. But when one such misguided and ahistorical fulfillment is to break the law of God and engage in elicit relationships in an attempt to find this lost attachment in an unnatural manner, this endeavor crosses over into the moral realm. The moral law responds “this is where you may not look for fulfillment, as it does not exist here. It will corrupt your soul and damage the natural order.”

Do not misunderstand our intentions. We do not plan to aggressively police the private actions of American citizens who have chosen to practice un-natural homosexual lifestyles in private. And we do not intend to establish harsh laws to subject this population to aggressively intrusive harassment. But we do intend to prevent homosexuality from being promoted as a healthy and societally accepted lifestyle, to prevent its practice from ever again rampantly spreading disease amongst our citizenry, and to sanction its open practice, as the public display and acceptance of such a lifestyle tends to normalize it and increase it’s practice, thereby increasingly subverting natural society. We do not accept this lifestyle as normal, and intend to reverse its acceptance, and the codification of marriage between homosexuals, in government and society.

Formulate New Policies Relative To Religion

—Eliminate free speech restrictions currently imposed on ministers of our Judeo-Christian churches, while maintaining their tax exempt status. Ministers’ voices must be unleashed in order to preach the morals, ethics, and policies that are encouraged by our Judeo/Christian ethic, and to influence congregants and other citizens to support and follow them.

—Close all American mosques proven to display radical anti-American literature and who preach these sentiments from the pulpit, specifically the aforementioned stated desire to substitute Sharia Law for the American Constitution here in America. Muslims who reject this Sharia ideology can be our neighbors and countrymen if they pledge primary allegiance to the American Constitution. Those who continue their commitment to Sharia Law naturally cannot accept American Constitutional rule, which is inherently antithetical to Sharia Law, and therefore cannot live among us as Americans—and will be deported. Freedom of religion was never meant to encompass religions that inherently hold the express intent of conflicting with, superseding, and eventually overthrowing our original American Republic. It was originally meant to allow loyal Americans to express their various religious sentiments in the manner they choose without restriction.

—Designate the Muslim Brotherhood as an international terrorist organization, putting an end to it’s subversion in the U.S., and deport it’s members.

—Close all churches that are found to teach Liberation Theology, a Marxist Communist construct, as they are an affront to and a perversion of their original faith, ultimately working in opposition to the original tenets of the American Republic and her founding beliefs and principles.

—Illegalize all forms of pornography, which result in the separation of sexual relations from the marriage contract. Only by supporting healthy and intact marriages and the fruits of their natural procreativity can we expect to turn back our national internal population decline, to keep our population morally healthy, and to negate the need for further foreign immigration into the U.S.

Completely Re-Think Immigration

—Stop all illegal immigration into the U.S. by finishing construction of an impermeable border wall along our Southern border, and in the future if it proves necessary, along our Northern border.

—Deport all illegal immigrants slowly and methodically over a period of five   years.

—Revoke the American citizenship of and deport all those who obtained their citizenship subsequently after initially arriving here illegally. They may then apply for re-entry according to our immigration laws. The intentions of hard left Democratic Party leadership to flood our borders in order for their party to gain unnatural voting hegemony, to assist in the breakdown of our republic through the introduction of peoples initially in the main inclined to support the Democratic Party because of its excessive welfare support policies and damaging immigration policies—will be stopped dead in its tracks.

Strongly Incentivize Internal National Population Growth

Financially incentivize increased American birthrates by providing substantial cash payments to American married parents for initial and subsequent children born to them. Child bearing and child rearing will again be celebrated and actively encouraged by our government and society, as will the institution of marriage. Other forms of non married cohabitation will be discouraged and dis-incentivized as being non-constructive to a thriving society. Marriage will be returned as the celebrated norm within American society, resulting in the increase of our natural offspring and the welfare of our general society.

In the city of Nagi Japan, the city government instituted policies to naturally increase the fertility rate of couples within the city. Offering generous cash payments for each subsequent child born to Nagi couples, the city raised its birth rate from 1.4 children per couple —the Japanese national average—a rate that could not ensure the continuation of the city’s citizenry, to an initial subsequent rate of 2.8, before finally settling at 2.4 children per couple. This is beyond the replacement rate of 2.1, ensuring a healthy city growth rate, and securing the demographic survival of the city.

These policies will be instituted here in America, ensuring our natural societal growth will result in our national survival, and will keep pace with our job market growth, eliminating the need to import foreign labor.

Completely Remake Education Policy

—Close the Department of Education, returning education to the states with over arching federal limitations to weed out curriculum promoted to weaken traditional American beliefs and values.

—Revamp school curriculums to reflect a healthy respect for a balanced version of American history and the American Constitution. Prohibit curriculum that supports conflicting forms of governmental and societal rule including Marxism, Fascism, Sharia Law, and the anti-Semitic and pro-Russian subversive tenets of the Alt Right. Prohibit curriculum that seeks to denigrate in an unbalanced fashion the founding of the U.S. and her history, in an attempt to use such propaganda as a lever in order to reduce our natural pride and patriotism, to overthrow our beloved founding traditions and tenets, and our society as a whole.

—Prohibit from teaching within the United States, at all grade levels, teachers and university professors who promote radical anti-American Marxist ideology and their desired institution of a socialist totalitarian state, in opposition to the liberty enshrined in the American Constitution, and those teachers who promote Sharia Law as a viable alternative to American rule of law and the American Constitution.

Purify Our Governmental Institutions

—Institute F.B.I. background checks—conducted by a purged and revitalized bureau—for all presidential candidates, Senators, members of Congress, and government employees—discovering the communist, fascist, sharia law, or alt-right leanings of potential members, and prohibiting their membership and service. These F.B.I. actions can only be accomplished after a complete purge of the intelligence agency’s personnel, expelling those who have in word and deed subverted our traditional republic, and replacing them with new field agents and upper level management supportive of our American Renewal.

—Conduct loyalty investigations for all government employees, Senators, and members of Congress, and American Presidents. Terminate the current service, and prevent the future service of all who are found disloyal to the American Republic and its founding documents and principles. As hard leftist individuals have burrowed into our State Department and other government agencies, they have altered our governmental decision making much to the detriment of our founding principles and beliefs. From our abandonment of Chiang Kai-Shek, allowing the rise of Mao Zedong and the oppressive Chinese Communist Party in the 1940s, to pushing the “need” for a coalition of nations to govern the world—The United Nations—promoted primarily in the United States by later outed Soviet spy and American State Department official Alger Hiss, which philosophically threatens American sovereignty—our American administrative state has again and again undercut our position and security in the world. Hard left operatives must be excised from our governmental ecosystem to assure the future and safety of our nation.

Completely Reformulate Foreign Policy Relative to China

Immediately commit to a complete economic decoupling from China, giving American companies a set period of time to finish their contracts to buy Chinese produced goods, to disinvest from Chinese securities, and to dissolve joint ventures between American and Chinese companies. After this period of decoupling, all transactions with Chinese companies will be heavily sanctioned, and if said business be continued in, will prevent said American companies from further accessing the American market and from manufacturing within U.S. borders. Attempts by third party nations to reroute Chinese goods mislabeled as goods produced by these third party nations will expose said nations to stiff economic sanctions.

By strict adherence to this trade policy, the Chinese economy will quickly begin to shrink to the point where they will no longer be able to fund their aggressive military buildup, which is solely aimed at the destruction of America and her allies. At that subsequent point, our major geopolitical enemy will be effectively taken off the table as an effective threat.

Rethink Defense Spending, Military Policy, And Internal Policing

—Immediately conduct a reversal of the Obama Administration’s military leadership purge, dismissing from service those previously installed due to their proclivity to follow the leftist anti-American policies of that administration, and returning those previously purged to service, should they desire, with full back pay. Military leadership will be returned to those who focus solely on our founding tenets, and on the absolute and effective defense of our republic against all true enemies.

—Immediately increase by 10% the pay rates for all military and police personnel. No American patriot willing to put their life on the line for their fellow Americans should ever trade their service for a position of relative poverty. The primary duty of federal, state, and city government is to ensure the protection of our nations citizens, and the primary goal of our nation’s warriors and police is that protection. The bond between citizen and protector must be strengthened, and showing more respect to our protectors begins with higher and more commensurate pay for the risks they willingly take on for us. Our protectors must be treated in a fashion equal to their dedication and to the risks they incur.

—Institute a policy of scrapping all military grade hardware—automatic weapons, armored personnel carriers, excessive rifle and pistol ammunition—previously donated by the American government to local police and governmental agencies, if they are no longer usable to the military. This over-arming of the police and governmental agencies has created what serves as an effective standing army, potentially available to turn on the American citizenry at any time, and cannot be allowed to continue to exist. The domestic balance of power must always be in favor of the American citizenry, ensuring our ability to resist and replace an unconstitutional and oppressive government should it become necessary.

—Return to the policy of fighting wars to vanquish our foes where the effort is absolutely necessary, irrespective of political sensitivities. The days of “winning hearts and minds,” all the while putting our warriors in greater danger through inappropriate rules of engagement, limiting their effectiveness in killing our enemies—will be over. The rules of engagement will simply be—kill the enemy with whatever means at your disposal, with only the consideration of human decency in mind relative to civilians and other non combatants, striving to minimize such casualties wherever possible. We are not animals after all, though we must be ruthless killers of those who actively seek our destruction and the violent subjugation of innocents.

—Prohibit the military service of members of subversive groups and all with criminal gang affiliations. It is lunacy to train this class of person in military tactics, only to see these same tactics later used in our streets against the American people.

—Immediately declassify all documents relative to American prisoners of war abandoned to communist regimes from all past wars and conflicts. Should it be found that any American administration or individual knowingly and purposely left behind any American soldier for any reason whatsoever, the involved still living American official or individual will be criminally prosecuted. Those complicit officials no longer living will have the record of their service corrected to reflect its dishonorable nature.

—Immediately begin investigations into military tragedies such as the attack on our consulate in Benghazi Libya and the subsequent death of four brave Americans, and the downing of Extortion 17, which killed 25 American Special Operations soldiers. We must get to the bottom of the culpability of all involved in causing these tragedies, whether their reasoning was faulty administration war fighting policy, or actual anti-American subversion in the leadership ranks. We strongly suspect the latter, and will aggressively seek and find the truth, no matter where it leads.

—Immediately begin investigations into the efforts by American leftists—within and outside of government—to subvert the administration of a duly elected American President during the Trump administration, and into the collaboration of General Mark Milley with the Chinese military in his treasonous breach of the chain of command.

—Continue and greatly enhance the portion of the National Defense Space Architecture (NSDA), instituted by President Trump, dealing with space based missile defense systems being planned to provide an effective shield against all nuclear or non-nuclear missiles incoming from foreign adversaries, providing an effective umbrella against such an attack on the U.S. homeland.

Discontinue Membership In Globalist Organizations

—Immediately withdraw from the United Nations, and terminate all monetary support to the organization. The shaping and founding of the U.N. was accomplished primarily by State Department official and later uncovered Soviet communist spy Alger Hiss. It was and is an organization founded on the desire of leftists for a globalist governing strategy, paving the way for a socialist globalist order, in circumvention of American national sovereignty, and serves as such to this day in opposition to American national interest.

—Immediately withdraw from and cease financial support for the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. The World Bank was part of the plan of Alger Hiss, and has played an active guiding role in the funding of the modernization of the Chinese communist economy, and the furtherance of the Chinese plan to supplant the U.S. as the global financial and military leader, and to ultimately align the world around a global communist state run by the Chinese Communist Party. Both the World Bank and the IMF are known for their globalist socialist inclinations and strategies, which are antithetical to the founding intent and continuing interests of the United States. Both of these organizations must be dismantled.

Restructure Domestic Fiscal Policy

—Institute a balanced budget requirement on Congress, except in times of war, and require budget surpluses to be saved untouched for national rainy days. The days of profligate spending by our elected leaders must be brought to an immediate end.

—Immediately begin to repay the Social Security fund, which Congress has treacherously spent on general expenses, shattering their promise to the American people to take funds extracted from our paychecks and put them into a “lock box” earning interest while accumulating with the original principle.

Restructure Domestic Monetary Policy

Close the Federal Reserve, and reset our national economy on the Gold Standard. Pegging our economy on the firm foundation of an unchangeable physical value will cure the nature of Congress to deficit spend, will eliminate the tragedy of inflation that robs Americans of their wealth, and bring fiscal sanity back into our economic system.

Purify The Judiciary

—Replace all federal, state, and local judges who do not subscribe to an originalist interpretation of the Constitution. Reinterpreting clearly established Constitutional intent from the bench is not the function of the judiciary—interpreting American Constitutional law according to its clear original intent and meaning is.

Rethink National Holidays

–Immediately establish Senator Joseph McCarthy’s birthday as a national holiday in memory of his tireless and timely fight against the scourge of communists resident in American government agencies. Communism is the ultimate antithesis to the American experience, about which McCarthy has not once been proven wrong in his accusations. His accusations stand and were based on solid ground when viewed now in retrospect and in light of all the available evidence, including the finally released Verona Papers that verify his accused to be of the political and personal character he ascribed to them.

Eliminate Hate Speech And Hate Crime Laws

—Eliminate all “hate speech” and “hate crime” laws at both the national and state levels. Laws that apply to all citizens equally adequately protect minorities. Hate speech laws are a long term attempt by the radical left to chip away at free speech protections enshrined in the Constitution by re-interpreting and then expanding what is deemed “hateful” to be the sincerely held beliefs of Constitutional Conservatives, therefore criminalizing said beliefs, and serve no real and productive purpose other than to potentially marginalize and criminalize the beliefs and practices of loyal traditional American citizens.

Restructure American Media

—Terminate the FCC licensing of all media that repeatedly report false claims that they know to be false, purposely withholding provable truths, propagandizing the citizenry with hard left anti-Constitutional philosophies, including socialism, communism, fascism, and the promotion of the anti-Semitic, pro-Russian philosophies of the “Alt Right”—which is in reality a leftist philosophy, seeking the permanent destruction of personal liberty and the institution of permanent totalitarian government control.

Prohibit Citizens Of Hostile Nations From Accessing American Educations

–Prohibit all foreign students from nations hostile to the United States from receiving American university educations. It makes no sense to educate the citizens of hostile foreign powers, enabling them to then use their enhanced knowledge and skill sets against our nation in the service of our enemies.

Establish English As Our Sole National Language

—Establish English as the official and sole language of the United States, requiring that all legal immigrants arriving on our shores quickly gain proficiency in its use, prohibiting secondary languages from being used in all public spaces and communications. When we Americans travel to foreign countries it is a sign of respect that we yield to the customs and language of the host country while there. The same should be true of foreigners taking up residence within our borders.

Restructure The Nature And Extent Of Government Service

—Convert membership in the House of Representatives and the Senate from a full time to a part time profession, and prohibit past members from financially benefitting from their previous government service. Many members have sought favor from American corporations and foreign governments while in office, in order to land lucrative employment once they leave government employment.

Scores of members of Congress and Senators have also used insider information gained through their security clearances and political positions to influence government policy, in order to financially benefit through informed stock trades unavailable to regular citizens.

Government service should be a matter of the heart and based in civic duty, not a matter of seeking excessive financial enrichment through such service. Those who have taken this to an extreme and have sold out America for their personal enrichment must be prevented from continuing to do so, and must be brought to justice for such subversion without delay.

Rethink Governmental Scientific Research

—All government research and promotion of anthropomorphic climate change theory will be prohibited, along with all other philosophies that seek primarily and unilaterally a reduction in American national economic output. In this manner our GDP and the resultant funds available for national defense will be protected, and our physical safety enhanced.

Restructure Important Social Institutions That Serve Our Youth

—Return the Boy Scouts and the Girl Scouts to their natural bases, limiting each group to its named gender membership and subsequent natural genetic identity. The Boy Scouts will be for genetically designated boys, and the Girl Scouts will be for genetically designated girls. Those who refuse to conform to their genetic identities assigned to then at birth by nature and nature’s God will be prohibited from membership and leadership, as they refuse to conform to nature and reality, and have effectively exited the natural human order.

Secure Our National Elections

Discontinue all use, both locally and nationally, of any electronic voting machine, and return to same day voting through in person paper ballots, viewed up close by both Democrat and Republican poll watchers, video taped at close range as a permanent record subject to review and independent verification. Eliminate all ballot drop boxes, and all mail in voting, except for those American citizens provably out of country. Additionally, require valid state or federal government issued identification in order for any citizen to vote. No non-citizen will be allowed to vote in any election in our country, whether a local, state, or federal election.

Restructure National Health Policy

—Immediately begin investigations into the suppression of low cost and highly effective medications for Covid 19 in favor of high cost gene altering therapies of dubious benefit and which cause great harm and death.  Said suppression effectively lined the pockets of large pharmaceutical companies and the subverted American health agencies, who gained financially from the mandating of high cost vaccines through their financial interest in patent rights and pharmaceutical company stock gains. Where the financial interest of these actors are found to have cost American lives through their collusion and deception, criminal tribunals will be warranted and established. An easily manageable pandemic was turned into a death warrant for hundreds of thousands of Americans, and those responsible must be held fully accountable for their treason.

—Transition from the Obama Care platform to a system of enhanced free market competition, promoting open competition across state lines for health policies. This will drastically lower overall program prices, and return both the number of quality doctors and the overall quality of care to their previous levels and beyond.

Commit To International Renewal

—Commit to extending the American Renewal to a European Renewal of Europe’s traditional values. Being the root of the American experience, America’s kinship to England and our strong ties to the countries of the traditional Western Alliance must be strengthened, and this extends naturally to assisting like-minded European patriots in the renewal of their traditional values and homelands.

Our View Of Government

We favor and promote individual liberty, and light and limited government control under normal circumstances. Hence, consider us on the right politically. The vast majority of leftist produced government programs have been abject failures. After government intervened in a failed attempt to offer support to poor American families through the AFDC program (Aid to Families of Dependent Children), the ultimate result was that black fathers left the family home, being financially incentivized to leave by the AFDC offering elevated financial assistance to homes with a mother but no father present. Due to this tragic government intervention, the presence of black fathers in their family homes plummeted, ruining the social structure of the black family. This result was apparently intentional, as the left sought to degrade the traditional black family structure and to create a societal underclass dependent on government assistance, thus insuring the black vote perpetually. The black community went from the demographic with the highest national levels of intact families to the lowest, causing untold grief for black youth, especially young black boys, who were deprived of their father’s presence and influence in their formative years—all to further a leftist agenda that runs counter to their well being and to our traditional American values. Those who promoted these destructive policies will be held accountable and in cases of extreme malevolence and subversion, will be held legally prosecuted and face potential deportation.

Since the advent of racial preferences accorded to minority college student applicants, the percentage of black and Latino freshman college students has not changed. For all the conversations and debates, all the government expenses and restrictions allotted to purportedly affect an increase has had zero net effect. Incentivized mentorship programs could have a far more dramatic and positive effect in these communities, and will be vigorously pursued.

After the implementation of Obama Care, which President Obama had promised would extend coverage to all Americans and at a 25% average savings, the actual results were that health insurance policy costs more than doubled. All Americans without health coverage were previously in reality covered, by being able to walk into any emergency room and automatically receive care for which they were unable to pay. So in the end, costs doubled and actual coverage remained the same, as is the natural result of absurd leftist government intervention.

For all the bluster, debate, and wasted time and effort, the majority of government programs would be better left untried or dismantled. This will allow government service to be a part time profession, greatly diminish cronyism, and will allow our federal budget to be balanced regularly. Tax rates can then be reduced, and more of Americans hard earned money will remain in their pockets, our military will be better funded, and needless government intrusion into the everyday lives of Americans will be eliminated.

Conclusion

With the events that transpired relative to the stolen 2020 presidential election, the subsequent stolen Georgia Senate runoff, and the stolen 2022 Arizona mid-term election that robbed Keri Lake of the governorship—it has become clear that though the Trump presidency had certainly been a good step in pushing back to some degree against the advances of the left in America and their intent to continue their Marxist revolution here, it has also become abundantly clear that a simple presidency was not sufficient to dismantle the six decades long purposeful degradation of our culture and polity at the hands of the left, and that neither President Trump’s nor Congress’ policies were sufficiently comprehensive for the task of securing the continuation of our democratic republic.

Large swaths of the American population have been effectively propagandized through the schools and media to support tenets of the left that cut at the heart of our American republic and its Judeo-Christian values and developed rule of traditional law.

A significant percentage of American citizens consider it acceptable to murder unborn babies in the womb at their mother’s demand at some point in a pregnancy. In this manner our most vulnerable emerging citizens are effectively stripped of their right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

A significant percentage of American citizens believe that our First Amendment speech protection should not be comprehensive, and should not extend to words and concepts that they find objectionable, and that incarceration is warranted if these culturally prohibited words and concepts are spoken. A high percentage of Democrat citizens believe that refusing to use a non-birth gender pronoun for a transsexual person should result in said refuser being incarcerated, which effectively cuts at the heart of the First Amendment of our Constitution, and is therefore a philosophy subversive to the original American ethos.

A significant percentage of American citizens believe that white police officers specifically target black men to kill them, which is provably untrue by verifiable statistics—a major propaganda victory for the left as the marginalization and dismantling of the police is a target goal of theirs as a step in their plans to deconstruct American society and leave it defenseless and therefore in need of increased federal government intervention and control.

A significant percentage of American citizens now believe that the existence of traditional patriotic Americans justifies the addition of a new category of “domestic terrorism.”  These “terrorists” then should be pursued, harassed, and prosecuted by the F.B.I., the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Justice for their beliefs and the manner in which they live their lives.

A significant percentage of American citizens believe that calling out fraudulent elections and that protesting such occurrences is sufficient to justify protestors’ imprisonment and torture.

A significant percentage of American citizens believe that socialism would be preferable to our traditional capitalism, though socialism always leads to violence by government against the citizenry and the impoverishment of the populace, and cuts against the high levels of freedom guaranteed in our Constitution.

There are now enough destructive tenets of the hard left that have been rendered acceptable to the American public, through decades of leftist propaganda, to potentially render solely democratic means insufficient to reclaim our republic in it’s original form, though we must at least attempt it within our strictly democratic structure initially. Benjamin Franklin stated that “Democracy is like two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.” We have reached the point where a significant portion of our citizenry no longer holds the beliefs that have undergirded our originally conceived American Constitutional Republic.  These beliefs and tenets have traditionally allowed a strictly democratic form of government to exist in America, ensuring the continued protection of the individual rights guaranteed in our Constitution. Without these beliefs and tenets in place, there is no longer a safe foundation to support strict democracy.  Under a strictly democratic form in this case, elevated forms of oppression and violence against members of the citizenry who seek to exercise their rights freely will become the norm.

Major corporations and American foundations are most all on the side of the socialist left in its attempts to copy socialist political and social national catastrophes of the past. These organizations pour hundreds of millions of dollars into Marxist communist organizations like Black Lives Matter, of whose leadership co-founder Patrisse Cullors openly admits “we are trained Marxists.”  By admitting to this political alignment, she places Black Lives Matter in the historical lineage of worldwide communism, which has foisted onto the world the murder of 100 million human souls in the last century, rendering this aggregate political movement one of the greatest socially destructive forces in recorded human history.

This major foundation funding and public support make them virtually unstoppable forces in the targeting of American conservatives, and the destruction of American traditional civil and constitutional society.

Even Republicans and some Conservatives have bought into the false memes of the left, fueling the Marxist communist line and giving them even more strength with which to destroy us.

If enough Americans are effectively propagandized by the left, and/or Democratic Party voter fraud prevents free and fair elections from returning—then strict democracy will no longer further our traditional constitutional form of governance, as the rights guaranteed as the base of our constitutional republican structure will have been effectively stripped and lost at the hands of the majority vote of a subverted citizenry, or by fraudulent elections at the hands of the subversive hard left.

There are principles undergirding our Constitution far more powerful than every person receiving an equal vote, no matter how subversive these voters have become to traditional American values and to America’s founding Constitution. Should enough of the American public be propagandized sufficiently towards totalitarianism, or our national vote continue to be skewed heavily by leftist voter fraud, and the now hard left Democratic Party consistently is able thus to illicitly win the national popular vote and move to further strip our constitutionally protected rights—the time for the adherence to strict democracy will temporarily be over, until a forced hard reset can be accomplished in America, and the citizenry and our polity returned to their traditional forms.  Unfortunately, that time may well be close at hand.

As more of the American public is propagandized towards communism by the media and the school system, and as 1,000,000 people are encouraged to immigrate to the U.S. legally every year—and millions more allowed to enter illegally— from countries with systems and beliefs antithetical to American Constitutional beliefs, and as these immigrants regularly gain citizenship and vote in the first generation at a 70% rate for the subversive leftist party, bribing them with unwarranted financial aid to enter the country—the time for strict democracy may well indeed be coming to a temporary end in order to ensure the renewal of our traditional culture and polity.

The vote of the hard left Democratic Party must be negated until their nature and actions, having become subversive to our nation and her founding principles, have been neutered, giving the party sufficient time to reform away from their currently intended subversion of our institutions.

In other words—the long march through the institutions of our great country by hard leftists will be over for all time through a forced hard reset of government and society.

Make no mistake about it—members of the American hard left are our mortal enemies. They propagandize our youth, splitting our families, turning the young against their parents and grandparents. They spread provably false narrative propaganda throughout society through their captured media in an attempt to disrupt and overthrow our benevolent country as founded. We cannot rest until they have been fully marginalized, by whatever means necessary, in order to salvage our historically developed political and civic culture, at which time we can again return to our traditional democratic structure and live our lives again in societal and political safety and tranquility.

When Whittaker Chambers, former Soviet spy turned American patriot, experienced a profound religious conversion and subsequently left the Communist Party, he said that communism would triumph over freedom, because Conservatives could never match the communists’ intensity of faith. The only hope was for the free world to discover a power of faith, which will provide man’s minds at the same intensity, with the same two certainties; a reason to live, and a reason to die.

After reading those words, an American actor, Ronald Reagan, registered as a Republican for the first time in his life, and continued to take down the communist Soviet Empire by developing that same and greater faith and intensity.

The time has come to arise in our own greater faith, intensity, and determination; to deconstruct the corrosive force of the hard left in American society; to tear down their destructive institutions and marginalize their leaders, to imprison for treason or deport the most seditious of their people, and to rebuild the tenets of our original republic in the citizenry of our great country.

These treasonous individuals are not our countrymen, but rather traitors intent on the destruction of the society and way of life that sustains us all and allows us our historically unparalleled personal freedoms. They seek to strip these freedoms—we intend to fight to the death to preserve them.

We have until now acted as a group of friends having drinks on the decks of a beautiful home overhanging the edge of a cliff over the ocean, hearing a persistent sawing sound in the basement, yet never breaking free of the celebration to discover the cause of the sound. That sound was the hard left attacking the foundational pillars of the very house that holds up the celebration in safety.

What sane person would not sense the danger, expel the attackers with whatever force necessary to preserve the home and its inhabitants, before returning to the party in renewed security? But we have carried on with the party like blind fools, ignoring the destruction of the home’s pillars, not truly caring for the soundness of the structure, nor the people relying on it for their safety, exposing us all to the danger of plunging to our deaths in the ocean. We have simply complained about and reported on the attack on the pillars, without effectively stopping the attack dead in its tracks with sufficient force in order to return to the celebration in absolute safety.

There is no time left, and I for one refuse to see the destruction of America on my watch—to have history judge me for complacency in the face of a seemingly overwhelming evil. It is time to save our great country, and to employ means sufficient to accomplish this great goal—the re-establishment of our beloved United States on its traditional moral and civic pillars. God help us find within ourselves the courage, intensity, and absolute resolve necessary to save our great country—our only home.

Machiavelli_643673c1-c777-46da-846b-38786ff96602

The Wicked Machiavellianism Of The Left

Machiavelli
Nicollo Machiavelli was an Italian political philosopher. His book The Prince was written in 1513. In it he opined that a ruler, who in establishing a kingdom or a republic used violence to accomplish his ends, should be excused when the intentions were “good” and the results were “beneficial.” From his philosophy we derive the common saying “the ends justify the means.”

Niebuhr
Reinhold Niebuhr was a leftist theologian who ran for the U.S. Congress on the Socialist ticket in 1932. Democrat James Comey, in his analysis of the writings of his hero Niebuhr, commented thusly: “the Christian in politics must be willing to transgress any purely Christian ethic. He must be willing to sin in the name of justice.” Comey used the name Reinhold Niebuhr as his personal Twitter handle, a clear testament to his affection for his own interpretation of Niebuhr’s political philosophy. When Comey’s interpretation of Mr. Niebuhr’s ethical philosophies were exposed in the conservative media, Comey abruptly changed his Twitter handle. Was it to hide his interpretations from being widely known? Almost certainly—Machiavelli would be so proud! Barack Obama said of Niebuhr “I love him. He is one of my favorite philosophers.” Hillary Clinton is also a Reinhold Niebuhr fan. As leftists, they clearly interpreted his works in the same manner as Mr. Comey.

When we evaluate the sentence “he must be willing to sin in the name of justice” we find that sin of course is an act committed in defiance of at minimum the Ten Commandments found in the Old Testament, from which we derive the basis of the Christian ethic.

Which commandments then would James Comey and others who adhere to their interpretation of Niebuhr’s philosophy feel comfortable breaking to further a cause that they would consider just by their definition?  Thou shall not bear false witness against thy neighbor? Comey tacitly implies that in politics lying is acceptable in the furtherance of their definition of justice. Would they bear false witness by withholding crucial evidence, or actually offering false evidence? It seems so, if it could be useful in the furtherance of what they consider to be justice by their revised definition.

So when Mr. Comey claimed regarding Hillary Clinton that “no reasonable prosecutor” would prosecute her for her clear felonies, and hence the F.B.I. would not either, what we may now assume is that he may simply have been lying to prevent what he saw as a threat to what he considered a just result—the furtherance of the leftist movement in America, of which he and Hillary Clinton are members. Prosecuting and convicting a prominent Democrat leader would have hurt the leftist cause badly. This to Mr. Comey would clearly set back the cause of his adopted form of “justice” and called for sinning in the name of said justice.

It should be noted that Comey voted for Gus Hall, the Communist Party USA candidate in the 1976 presidential election, as did John Brennan, who ran Obama’s C.I.A. Hall rose to General Secretary of the CPUSA and was then awarded the Soviet Order of Lenin, after having originally studied for two years at the International Lenin School in Moscow. So in point of fact Comey voted for a communist candidate who was trained in the communist Soviet Union. May it not be reasonably inferred then that Comey is at minimum a communist sympathizer, in light of his vote for a Communist Party USA candidate? Is communism not the political philosophy whose leaders have murdered 100 million citizens of communist countries in the philosophy’s short history, of which Comey was clearly historically aware? Is this not the ultimate social injustice? Apparently not in the mind of James Comey, nor of John Brennan.

Gramsci
The Italian communist, Antonio Gramsci, lived at the time of Stalin. He was the head of the Italian communist party. Gramsci sought to foment an Italian revolution similar to the Bolshevik Revolution that had been previously successful in Russia. His efforts were completely thwarted by the nature of the Italian citizenry, which was wholly devoted to God through their Catholic faith, and therefore disinclined to replace God with the State, which is a prerequisite to the adoption of communism. The institutions of the Italian culture and society—the schools, the courts, the media, the police, the military—were based on the church, and solidly held up the Italian government, making it impervious to subversive attacks against it. Therefore Gramsci failed miserably in his attempts at Italian governmental overthrow.

Gramsci was imprisoned 20 years for his subversion, where he ruminated daily about what he might have done differently in order to have had success with his Italian revolution. He realized that there first needed to be a concerted effort to weaken and finally destroy the supportive institutions that prop up any western democracy, and particularly that of the United States, in order to make it more effective to then attack the weakened government and topple it in favor of a communist replacement regime. His writings have elevated Gramsci into the upper echelons of the communist pantheon, and his strategies have been widely read and carefully applied by hard leftists, including those in the U.S., for many decades.

In Gramsci’s Prison Diaries, written during his incarceration, he elaborated on his newly developed tactics to attack the institutions of any target society. He encouraged fellow revolutionaries to infiltrate the furthest left political party in the target country and to eventually take it over (which has clearly happened in today’s Democratic Party in America) He taught his followers to attack every tenet of the traditional church in order to diminish its influence in society. This strategy and effort has clearly been underway in America for quite some time. He encouraged the infiltration of the school system by fellow travelers in order to propagandize students into the communist philosophy and to teach philosophies counter to the tenets of the church and traditional Americann society. Some of these tenets include that marriage is only between a man and a woman, that homosexuality is not normal and is indeed a sin, and that God created only two distinct genders. As is easily seen, each of these and other base tenets of the church is under sustained attack by the hard left in America and throughout most of the world. And of course they are—most hard leftists leaders in the U.S. are intimately familiar with Gramsci’s philosophies and writings, and are at work utilizing his tactics in order to arrive at a different revolutionary outcome in the United States than was possible in Italy in Gramsci’s time.

Social Justice
By “sinning in the name of justice” James Comey does not mean actual traditional justice, in its long accepted definition, which is exactly what the keeping of the commandments secures for any population. If one does not bear false witness, but instead gives others only factual information on which to base their decisions—this is just. If he follows the commandment thou shall not steal, he allows others to keep the earned fruit of their labors—this is just. Traditional and eternal justice is arrived at by following the commandments, which is defined as just treatment and culminates in a state of actual societal justice.

Social justice is arrived at by the breaking of any of the commandments—which in essence is unjust in reality—in order to bring about by whatever means necessary the non-traditional definition of justice—the equal economic outcome of all citizens regardless of their willingness to work, their talents, their contributions to society, or the tragic resultant economic losses to their overall society that always results from such an attempt, ending in the impoverishment of the entire population, including the exact populations the left purports to be lifting up. Social justice is in effect the usurping of the original all wise and eternal lawgiver and his declared definition of justice, and replacing him within society with a select group of mortal, fallible humans beings who then define their own subjective version of what are to be considered just actions and policies in society, according to their human and therefore potentially flawed opinions.

The political philosophy of James Comey relative to the gaining of political power and the making of societal revolution, is in essence the same as that of Joseph Stalin, who proclaimed “you cannot make a revolution with silk gloves.” Stalin utilized these same Machiavellian principles to justify the murder of 20 million of his fellow Soviet citizens whom he felt stood in the way of the social justice goals of the Soviet Union. Mr. Comey clearly interprets Niebuhr’s writings as concluding that it is just and right to break any purely Christian ethic or commandment, and that would it seems include the commandment against murder, which Joseph Stalin broke day after day against the population enslaved within his Soviet Union. Could that be why the American hard left has such a difficult time fully objecting to the atrocities of Stalin?

In light of James Comey’s stated political philosophy, which runs counter to the biblical ethics of justice long accepted by the American public—is there any reason to consider his past actions as having ever been actually honest according to our common traditional ethic of honesty? Since, according to his own words, he does not share a common set of ethics with the American public, can he ever really be believed, and should he ever have been in control of an investigative division of the American government originally devoted to the furtherance of justice, which should clearly have its operating basis in truth and actual traditional justice?

James Comey voted for the American communist Gus Hall for president, whose political philosophies he has never disavowed. Obviously his higher loyalty is to the long term communist revolution, not the societal principles and ethics that gave birth to and undergird the American republic. He was not then nor is he now fit to hold any position in the American government. Mr. Comey could not then nor now pass a traditional F.B.I. background check conducted by his own former agency in order to serve as janitor at any federal building because of his documented communist leanings and associations. Yet he was chosen without any meaningful congressional oversight to serve as the director of the agency established to safeguard the original American principles of truth and justice, made possible specifically because Congress no longer requires such vetting for subversive political leanings and associations, nor is the now politically captured F.B.I. inclined to pursue traditionally subversive elements in our society and government.

Was the Democrat Hillary Clinton not exercising the same Machiavellian principle when she lied to Congress as to whether she had any classified e.mails on her home server? Or when she had aids smash her smart phones with hammers in order to make information on them unavailable for the normal required public scrutiny of a government employee’s communications? Was she not simply bearing false witness, breaking our traditional moral code, in the service of what she considers to be a higher law? That “higher law” would be the furtherance of the socialist revolution long sought by the American hard left in order to forcibly foist on the populace their coercive and twisted version of social justice and socialist governance. Covering her tracks and getting away with it all, in her mind, has protected and furthered that revolution, keeping hidden what we have to assume are subversive communications that she engaged in. Why else would she go to such great lengths to hide the content of her communication devices? She also was and is now unfit to be employed in government by the American people, as she was working without holding the common ethic of justice held by the vast majority of Americans. Hillary also could not pass a traditional F.B.I. background check due to her philosophical leanings and hard left associations, but is seems none is required to serve as our country’s first lady, to serve as our Secretary of State, nor to run for the office of President of the United States.

Democratic Party Machiavellian and Gramscian Policies: AFDC
During the New Deal under President Franklin Roosevelt, legislation was passed called Aid to Families with Dependent Children. Under the rubric of compassion, the program provided for income assistance to low income American families. One of the stipulations of the program was that it would be provided only to households without a father living in the home, which was indicated as a severe disadvantaging criterion. The implied compassion under which Democratic lawmakers introduced the bill was supposedly expressed through the elevated economic assistance offered to these families. But as the left traditionally follows the tenets of Machiavelli, Niebuhr, and Gramsci, what might have been the actual obfuscated background reasoning behind the legislation?

The end result of AFDC was that poor black fathers were heavily financially incentivized to move out of their own nuclear family homes that contained their children and children’s mother, separating the fathers physically from both. This resulted in great emotional suffering for black children, and especially black boys. Then ensued, as a result of this legislation, the rise of black inner city gangs, as these disenfranchised boys sought to belong to any meaningful social construct that they had lost when their fathers left. Inner city violence exploded. Concurrently occurred the shattering of the American black family in general, which went from having the highest level of intact traditional families of any racial group in America, to thereafter having the lowest level, and the highest level of absentee fatherhood. Today, seven out of ten black children are born out of wedlock—fatherless black households are the statistical norm. In retrospect, did any form of justice ensue from this legislation?

Judged from a traditional American ethical framework, AFDC would seem to have been simply a legislative mistake, that had unintended negative consequences. But when judged through the prism of the teachings of Machiavelli and Gramsci carried forward through the Democratic Party, a different probability arises. Could not the results of AFDC have been easily foreseen by anyone even slightly inclined to predict the clear potential consequences? Was it not obvious that poor but intact black families would be strongly financially incentivized by the proffered governmental assistance after moving fathers out of their family homes? And would this not clearly then have broken these black boys spirits and led to social unrest and crime? Would this then not clearly have financially impoverished the American black family further, by encouraging black fathers to leave the support of their children to the government, leaving these families then even more financially dependent on government assistance in the future? And would this not then have clearly driven the black family to ally themselves more closely with the American political party that would offer the most unearned benefits in response to their resultant increased financial need, therefore resulting in a more dependent and loyal constituency for the Democratic Party?

The Latin phrase cui bono—to whose benefit—is always a guide to understanding the background reasoning for any action or policy introduction. Who exactly benefited from the black family being weakened and further impoverished, when it was easily predictable that this would be the result of AFDC? Clearly not the black family for which the legislation was supposedly crafted—but the Democratic Party did. They gained an almost totally loyal constituency group, who in their socially and financially weakened condition needed the Democratic Party then more than ever for financial benefits, as the economic undergirding of their families had been effectively shattered. The long used phrase “give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach him to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime” has been completely inverted. The Democrats subscribe more closely to the philosophy “separate all those who would like to fish together today, take away their fishing rods and their bait, break their legs so they can’t walk to the river, and they will rely on you to give them fish for a lifetime.” And because of this they will vote for you in perpetuity. An added benefit to the left under Gramscian theory is the breakdown of the black family structure for its own sake, which directly undermines the church teaching that a family is comprised of a father, mother, and children living together. Many black families have now abandoned this teaching as a result of government policies that financially disincentivized the holding together of their families. This greatly weakens the influence of the church in black society, furthering a goal of Antonio Gramsci with the methods of Machiavelli.

Democratic Machiavellian and Gramscian Policies: Immigration
As the left continues to seek to keep our borders open to unfettered illegal immigration inflows, they seem to care not at all for the displacement of American workers in our job market. It would seem that the Democrats have calculated that alienating Americans who are forced into unemployment or underemployment by illegal immigration is of less political importance than the addition of millions of illegal aliens to the Democratic Party voting rolls, as they traditionally vote at a 70% rate for the Democratic Party in the first generation.  As is typical of the followers of the aforementioned political philosophers, they cloak their policies in “compassion,” when the real intent is gaining un-earned political hegemony.

The left knows that if they can bring in millions of foreign workers into our political mainstream, regardless of the negative consequences to the American worker, they will gain millions of new first generation voters to their cause. Using this tactic, they seek to eventually gain political dominance over conservative Americans, and that this will bring them to the brink of instituting an authoritative socialist state to rule over us all. Again, the political philosophies of Machiavelli, Niebuhr, and Gramsci guide their intentions and actions, as they strive to use deception and even violence if necessary to bring them closer to their ideal of political justice—the complete subjugation of the American conservative, who holds contrary and completely antithetical views of what is the best philosophical, cultural, and political structure of American society, and who default to our original religious tenets, traditions, and Constitution.

Democratic Machiavellian and Gramscian Policies: The 2020 Elections
The political philosophies of Machiavelli, Niebuhr, and Gramsci undergirded the Democratic Party approach to the 2020 presidential election. Since President Trump represented the single greatest threat to the furtherance of the hard leftist revolution in the U.S., with his concerted attempts to counter the results of Gramscian theory by strengthening the country economically, militarily, and by promoting and strengthening our traditional culture, the “ends” became of primary importance—he must be defeated.  The “means” devised and employed were massive voter fraud, turning a decisive victory for Trump into his narrow defeat. With leftist media and politicians bearing false witness as to the fraud committed, all of course without remorse nor shame as in their minds social justice was served—the fraud was effectively pulled off and covered. And now the left is moving quickly in 2021 to codify their recently effective methods, seeking to make mail-in balloting mandatory in every state in the nation, while removing any effective identification requirement to prove actual eligibility to vote, thereby enabling the cheating to be institutionalized, and to completely negate the conservative vote in our country. In other words, conservative voters will no longer have any representation commensurate with actual vote totals for candidates for our federal and state governments, and will have no resultant say in their policies. Thus there will now be no truly effective counterbalance to the hard leftist policies of the Democratic Party. Only submission and powerless objections, or counter revolutionary action, will be the possible remaining conservative reactions as the left completely radicalizes our federal government and our election processes.

Where Are The Limits To The Machiavellian Evil The Hard Left Will Commit?
With the philosophies of Machiavelli and Gramsci as their operating principles, the question must be asked—what if any are the limitations to the commandments the Democrats will transgress in their pursuit of their ultimate goals when they have effectively and permanently rendered the voting input of half the American population moot by means of bearing false witness through election fraud? And under what principles would they then place any limitations on the extent to which they would oppress conservatives? Those reading who operate in their lives with respect to the commandments and to a traditional definition of justice assume in general that Democrats would limit their future commission of evil out of respect to conscience, as they themselves would. This assumes that hard leftists think like traditional Americans do—yet they clearly don’t.  It is a grave misunderstanding of the hard leftist mindset, and of their decision making processes relative to human ethics. They do not share our common values and morality. They accept no limits on the extent to which they will go should it serve their political ends.  They intend to force a form of government on us that is diametrically opposed to our ideals and values. When we look out at the communist regimes of countries that the American left has supported, we see outrageous atrocities having then been committed, and in many cases still being committed today. From Stalin, to Mao, to Ho Chi Minh, to Castro, to Chavez, to Maduro, to Xi Jinping—the American left has supported, justified, and lionized them all—because their desired ends are identical.

Most American leftists in our government are Maoist Communists, supporting foremost the tenets and policies of Chinese communism, and are either supportive of or actually colluding with the Chinese Communist Party. Yet Communist China uses slave labor to produce consumer goods. China is currently committing  genocide against the Uighur minority within China, enslaving them in 380 concentration camps, subjecting their women to mass rape by their Chinese captors in order to dilute their gene pool, subjecting them to forced sterilization in order to eventually end the very existence of their people. Are not socialist/communist regimes supposed to have instituted a more just form of government, reflected in equitable treatment of all sectors of their populations? Apparently not. And how do American leftists justify their associations and support for the CCP? They remain silent on this subject, but the phrase “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” seems to describe their motivations well relative to China. Traditional America is their enemy, therefore America’s enemy China is their friend, with whom they share a common philosophy and sympathy. They do not seek any form of actual social justice as a true ethic, nor do they require it of their ally China, but instead use the concept as a useful lever to overturn American institutions holding up our traditional form of government, which stands in the way of the realization of their totalitarian socialist world dream. Should American leftists gain sufficient political power, they will immediately drop all pretense and commence the oppression of all forces that stand against their revolution, as their philosophical allies in China have already done, and in particular will harshly persecute all politically conservative Americans who stand against communism, and in support of our traditional religious, civic, and political culture.

Are U.S. concentration camps inhabited by American conservatives in our American future? It is quite possibly so, should we not find the means to reverse the recent political developments that have given leftists virtually complete control of our government and culture in perpetuity. Since communists know no moral nor ethical boundaries, it is safe to assume that negotiating with them from our current state of cultural and political weakness is untenable. There clearly is no viable and ultimately effective way to resist the current communist revolution taking place in America short of counter-revolutionary action. Mao Zedong, who founded the Chinese Communist Party, famously stated that “political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.” When dealing with current day communists who faithfully follow Mao’s teachings and always resort to suppressive violence when they gain sufficient political power, American conservatives must adopt an effective counter-balancing strategy including the willingness to potentially use arms in self defense against the left, or there is no future for our traditional American republic, nor for the millions of American conservatives living within our borders.  If we do not act, we will live under the boot heel of American communists in the country that those who held to our traditional tenets and beliefs founded and established—and we to our great shame will have neglected and lost.

Even the God of the Bible used what might be construed to be Machiavellian ethics in his commandments to the Israelites to kill entire populations down to the last man, woman, and child. The ends to which he went though were in actuality truly just by eternal traditional principles, as were therefore the harsh means he sometimes employed, without needing to revert to ‘sinning in the name of justice.’ God does not sin as Machiavellians and Gramscians do. He commanded his people the Israelites to slaughter certain whole populations that they encountered, and to leave not one man, woman, nor child alive. These tribes had adopted horrific and degraded practices of human abuse, and God judged the highest good of the world to be their elimination, and for no remnant of their horrific actions to remain on the earth, in order to protect the just societies remaining from being socially contaminated and eventually ruined by their associations with the practices of these tribes. It was akin to a doctor making the difficult decision of cutting off a gangrenous leg to save the rest of the patient’s body.  It was righteous and fully justified. It was a true case of the ends being actually justified, because the ends were wholly good and right. In the case of the hard left practicing Machiavellianism today, the ends are not good, are not justified by any eternal ethic, and do not have the actual good of the country nor the world writ large as their goal. They seek to enslave, to control, to wield totalitarian government control against all dissenters, many of whom are followers of the God of the Bible. They seek to strip us of our human freedoms, and to sanction by law the following of any religion except that which worships their socialist state.

There is one grand difference between God and his people, and those on the left who utilize Machiavellian and Gramscian ethics and tactics in their lives and political pursuits. To choose for the highest actual good of any society is the basis for all of God’s decisions, and should also be for his followers. This is the truest definition of love. Leftists choose ends which always ultimately degrade a society, and bring misery to its people under the guise of justice, for the satisfaction of their perverse desire to become gods themselves and then determine the unlimited means appropriate to arrive at the ends they unwisely and arrogantly choose. The character of the ends chosen, when studied carefully, are clearly seen as divergent between godless communism and the God on which our traditional religiously based constitutional republic was firmly based. In communism, the means and the ends are unjustifiable. In the Soviet Union, the national state culmination of leftist ideology and struggle, the government murdered 30,000,000 of its own citizens for their divergent beliefs, and imprisoned millions more, subjecting them to torture and unspeakable privations, in order to enslave and control them, forcing their adherence to a false and destructive communist philosophy. Soviet citizens lived as virtual captive slaves in their own country.

The United States though, long considered the epitome of traditional religious and civic values, and based historically on godly principles, and having long held to a strict traditional philosophy of justice, has a body count of its own citizens that is infinitesimal by comparison, and traditionally has provided its citizens a level of freedom and potential for happiness that is unparalleled in human history. The means employed to undergird and maintain this great and generally good civilization have in most every situation been sufficiently justified, as will be any similar attempts made in the future by traditional Americans, including in any instance in which we may be compelled to kinetic action to defend our developed civilization.

Conservatives in America have been in a conservatism 1.0 status for many decades, characterized by their awakening to the subversive methods of the left and its attempts to culturally and politically subjugate us, and to eventually foist a totalitarian socialist government upon us.  The conservative 1.0 focus has been on educating and organizing politically to gain power against the left in political self defense. True heroes of this movement have informed and educated millions of conservative Americans as to these realities, and brought out the vote to further conservative ideals. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, Diana West, Trevor Loudon, Jeff Nyquist etc. have spent their lives in this educational attempt. Donald Trump has also spent a number of years attempting to place us back generally on a foundation of traditional American values. Yet we find ourselves at a juncture—having been completely overwhelmed in the 2020 elections by fraud, collusion, and deceit—where our conservatism 1.0 heroes no longer have sufficient answers to meet our current reality. It is of no use now to follow traditional political methods in order to have like minded politicians elected to represent our values and ideals, which was a hallmark of conservatism 1.0. This is no longer possible as the left has established an overwhelming level of propaganda control in our schools, media, and government, effectively censoring conservative ideals, and preventing them from being disseminated to the public at large in order to influence our society. They have now also devised means to defraud us of our vote, effectively disenfranchising us through the targeted subversion of our electoral processes. With their current control of the entirety of government, won through fraudulent means, Democrats are pushing to permanently nationalize the methods they employed successfully in the 2020 battleground states, which would in the next four years ensure their political hegemony in perpetuity. Their aggressive use of Machiavellian, and Gramscian principles and policies have brought them to the precipice of a finished revolution here in the states, and if successful they will now take off the gloves and begin their persecution and subjugation of American conservatives who have stood opposed to them.

We are in desperate need of a new approach, an advanced and improved conservatism 2.0, in order to save ourselves from the onslaught by the left that is beginning now against conservatives in America, as we are rapidly being characterized as domestic terrorists to be hunted by a completely politicized F.B.I and Homeland Security. Those of us who carry forward the traditional American religious and political tenets from our forefathers are now the hunted in our own country. We must immediately turn this equation around, and become the pursuers of those who seek to make illegal our traditional lifestyles and beliefs, and persecute and imprison us for who we are and what we believe. We are at the point where only a strong kinetic offensive response will push back on their heels those who are coming for us to politically and physically subjugate us.

This will be a time fraught with danger, as the means to our ends, which are now our political and physical survival, and ultimately our American Renewal, are more limited and much more dangerous. Unless we as American conservatives shake ourselves awake from our fatal lethargy, we will soon find that the noose is already in place and tightened, and escape no longer possible. Living in the normalcy bias—imagining that life will continue along as it always has, and that there is no need to act to prevent disaster—will prove ultimately fatal if continued in. Thinking that we can now be saved by political organizing, or the rebirthing of past conservative figures, or by discovering new political heroes—is a false hope. Those doors have now effectively been closed to us through the effective use of institutionalized voter fraud.

Our organization American Renewal, will be exploring the new philosophies and methods necessary to assure the survival of American conservatives, and of our very republic itself. The time is now for American heroes to stand up and lead us back into freedom. Will you be one of those heroes that history will remember and celebrate for their foresight, resolve, and courage? Or will you be remembered as an American who sat idly by while our republic was destroyed in our time and on our watch?  The time for clear thinking is now, and the time for decisive action is fast approaching…

riot_7012c8ec-497e-4865-ad8f-5a7d1d1d8cb4

The Right Of Rebellion

The right of rebellion against unjust and unconstitutionally based government, and the forced replacement of said government, is enshrined in the words of our republic’s founders. It is the foundational principle on which our American republic rests. The Declaration of Independence, the seminal defining document of the creation of the American republic spells this out, defining clearly who we are as Americans:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

In the political milieu of 2021, our current federal administration, elected through intentionally fraudulent means https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/the-navarro-report-the-immaculate-deception/ is proceeding to threaten, marginalize, and subjugate their conservative political enemies, those of us who hold staunchly to our original and traditional way of life and founding documents, by defining us as “domestic terrorists” as a way to marginalize and weaken us sufficiently, so that we will be sufficiently intimidated to stand down in the face of their tyranny, thus allowing them to continue unabated in their drive to strip our constitutional rights and general liberties.

A domestic terrorist, in the original and appropriate meaning, is one who seeks to weaken and destroy our founding form of constitutional government, overthrowing it for some other system not rooted in liberty and individual rights. It has not heretofore been defined, until recently by communists within our government and society, as someone who seeks to maintain and strengthen our traditional constitutional republic, yet stands against the current administration because of its attempted usurpations of our rights and founding principles. This to them now is their twisted definition of “domestic terrorist”; anyone who stands against the current administration, no matter the firm justification for doing so as defined by the Declaration of Independence.

Communists are masters of propaganda, and this current narrative reversal is designed to turn long held principles and definitions upside down; to call the truth a lie, and to call the lie a truth. It is intended to twist long held meanings and definitions into cudgels in the hand of the left to bludgeon us into submission with, as they know full well that we stand as the last American bulwark against their tyranny.

In reality, as is always the case, hard leftists accuse the right of what they themselves are actually doing, as a means to deflect from their actions and sanitize their intentions. Like the errant minister railing against sexual sin from the pulpit while visiting prostitutes on Friday night, leftists make it obvious to the observant what their true intentions and hidden actions are by what they falsely and overly aggressively accuse others of doing.

They falsely accuse Republicans of disenfranchising poor black Americans by requiring everyone to show proper identification at the polls, though every black American is able and free to obtain such identification, and in reality virtually all possess it in order to drive, enter a bar, cash a check, etc. Yet as the left rails against the right for “disenfranchising” other Americans, they themselves employed massive election fraud in the 2020 presidential election to disenfranchise up to 80 million Americans who expressed their intent to elect the candidate on the right. It is all ruse and deflection; it is pure propaganda and psychological projection, and a perverse attempt to veil their true intentions from reaching judgement in the light of day.

So then, when the left accuses the right of being domestic terrorists, exactly what manner of projection in this case are they employing? What is the actual truth behind the projected accusation? Let’s start with the Democratic Party selecting Kamala Harris to be our Vice President. Knowing that Joe Biden is suffering from some sort of accelerating dementia, it is clear to them and to all that he will not be able to serve long, and at the least will not be able to perform the duties of the office effectively while he is still there. Putting Harris in the vice presidential slot effectively makes her a potential president. Who then is Kamala Harris? In the attached article in The Epoch Times by Trevor Loudon, https://www.theepochtimes.com/kamala-harriss-socialist-ties_2815003.html Mr. Loudon spells out clearly Kamala Harris’ 40 year close associations with communists and communism.  These associations would be more than sufficient to deny Harris an F.B.I. background clearance, if one were still required to be elected to public office in the United States, and if the F.B.I. could still be trusted. Communism is a political form completely antithetical to the American Constitution and founding principles. Communism is the natural archenemy of the U.S. constitutional system, as it entails the stripping of freedoms, and the elevation of the power of government over the will of the people. It strips individual liberties, elevates the power of the state over the individual, and murders dissenting portions of its population wherever it is adopted in order to maintain this unjust power.

Again, a domestic terrorist, in the original and appropriate definition, is one who takes action to weaken and destroy our founding form of constitutional government, overthrowing it for some other system not rooted in personal liberty and individual rights. Any individual involved in actively promoting a form of government antithetical to the individual liberties specifically enshrined in the American Constitution by definition is working against the traditional American system of government, attempting either in word or deed to overthrow it. In common usage, the term terrorist connotes physical action; yet the left has termed everyday American conservatives as domestic terrorists, often times solely because of their conservative beliefs, which the left sees as a threat to their counterfeit version of America, which is antithetical to the Founders original intent. Those who believe in the sanctity of human life are now named as domestic terrorists. Those who voted for the candidate on the right in 2020 are “domestic terrorists.” Their basis for these accusations seems to be that anyone who stands philosophically against the leftist version of America, as opposed to the version framed by our founders in the original meaning of the Constitution, is now a domestic terrorist, and one to be pursued by the now subverted F.B.I. and Department of Homeland Security.

Keeping in mind the left’s psychological projection and deflection techniques, we of course can draw the conclusion that as they throw about their accusations of domestic terrorism against American conservatives, they know that they in reality are in the process of committing a form of actual domestic subversion, according to the original interpretation, and especially according to their own expanded definition of the word “terrorist.” Kamala Harris certainly fits this definition perfectly; she is and has been involved in the active promotion of a system of government antithetical to the American Constitution. She comes from a family of communists, takes as her friends communists, and advances policies originated in the Communist Party U.S.A., and stands against conservative Americans who staunchly oppose communism. She also encourages political violence in our streets to accomplish this systemic change. She, by doing so, places herself in the political lineage of those in communist governments who have murdered 100 million human souls, fellow citizens of their own countries, in the first century of the existence of communism.

Harris was clearly aware of the hard left’s attempt to terrorize the American public with the introduction of Covid 19 by China, a communist state, and the subsequent purposeful state and federal governmental overreach that subsequently stripped long held American liberties by inculcating unwarranted fear in the hearts of many Americans. These were and are communist inspired activities carried out by the hard left. She was also clearly aware of the election fraud her party and supporters committed, cutting at the heart of our original representative government. These are actions that she clearly supports that are meant to disenfranchise and terrorize Americans. These actions, when combined with the oppressive power of a leftist federal government gone rogue, equate to the definition of actual domestic terrorism; the use of force to overthrow the current American constitutional order. According to the original meaning of the term; no one more closely fits the definition of a domestic terrorist than do Kamala Harris and her cohorts in the Democratic Party. The left then deflects the recognition of this reality, and projects it onto those of us who are actually the antithesis of domestic terrorists; those who support our founding form of government fully, and want to return to its safe harbor of protection.

The truth is starkly the opposite of what the left in America is currently promoting. Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party need to be considered what they in reality clearly are themselves—actual domestic terrorists intent on overthrowing our great American republic, replacing it with its antithesis; the communist state. Regardless of their attempts to redefine language and long held dictionary definitions, to deflect the consideration of this reality, and to project the accusation onto others to avoid their own detection—they are in fact the domestic terrorists of whom they speak. They need to be clearly considered as such, and treated accordingly.

The Declaration of Independence speaks to all Americans in our day boldly and clearly. At no time has the federal government been more clearly aligned against the will of Americans who hold to our great constitution and founding traditions; in other words, no administration to date has been more clearly aligned against traditional America. Leftists have infiltrated our government, most of which also could not pass an F.B.I background check to even secure a federal job to sweep the halls of congress, even if this subverted agency were inclined to perform one in these cases. Leftists in our government have committed a long train of abuses, instituting a form of government destructive to the ends of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. They have worked incessantly to pass legislation making the long held tenets of our Christian churches illegal, normalizing aberrant lifestyles that have long been held to be abhorrent and destructive to the very fiber of our society. They have purposely worked through propaganda to divide the races which previously had learned to coexist well, in their current attempt to sow discord and strife amongst us in order to foment revolution. They have worked and are still working to disarm Americans of the very defensive weapons that are the only bulwark against an oppressive government, following the pattern of Nazi Germany and Socialist Venezuela, who disarmed their citizenry through ‘public safety” measures, and then proceeded to oppress,  terrorize, and subjugate their disarmed and helpless citizens with their own confiscated weapons. They have worked and continue to work to make certain speech illegal, in direct contravention of the first amendment of the constitution. Through massive and coordinated voter fraud, they have disenfranchised 80 million American citizens, because they could not win a national election on the merits of their perverse intentions, initiatives, and policies.

This “long train of abuses and usurpations” in an attempt to “reduce us under absolute despotism” has rendered it our right and duty to throw off this illegal and immoral form of government, and renew it in the original form of the American Republic. This can no longer be accomplished by national elections, as they have been permanently subverted and are now subject to leftist control. We must explore the original means of “throwing off an oppressive government” referred to by Thomas Jefferson when he wrote the Declaration of Independence, which are the only means effectively available to us now. We must stand shoulder to shoulder and fight with arms if and when necessary in order to save and renew our great American Republic. The only other option now is our eventual complete and total subjugation.

The ridiculousness of our situation now is that, through the propaganda of the hard left and the news media, men and women who hold the positions of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and other American Founders, are now today defined as domestic terrorists by our government and its subverted federal agencies. This illustrates the power of leftist propaganda, repeating lies day in and day out, until the lie becomes the truth for a large portion of the population, and the truth paradigm is completely perverted. Still the original truth of our republic holds true—that virtuous citizens have the right to self govern, and to keep their government from amassing sufficient intention and power to subjugate them.

In the lead up to World War II, the American public was slow to awaken to the genocide against the Jews taking place in Germany, and did little originally to stop the Nazi military rampage through Europe. Yet when we finally awoke, we took hard and determined kinetic action to defeat this great foe. Let us not shirk our duty today to stand against the enemies of our republic who are now inside the wire living amongst us, seeking to overthrow our country and replace it with another form of government and society, one in which we will certainly not be welcome, and where brutal prisons will be constructed to house us until we are dead.

American Renewal

00029-1090444170

Prophecy-Some Christian’s Excuse For Inaction

In today’s America we have millions of Christians who should and may well still serve as the backbone of the resistance against the globalist anti-God communism infecting us here and throughout the entire world. American Christians hold all the traditional beliefs and tenets that have historically undergirded the American national experience, and have the most to lose should we be overcome in this philosophical and political fight. The enemy seeking to overwhelm us is demonic and determined to establish anti-Christian principles and principalities to rule over us. The American Christian experience is the historical root of the American experience, and relies on the judgement and commitment of her Christians in order to preserve its very historical existence.

Yet many of my fellow Christians have become enamored with believing that they have an air tight understanding of Biblical prophecy—that we are clearly in the end times—and that all the evil coming at us in the world is the will of God, who is fulfilling the end of prophetic history in our very own time, preparing the way for Christ’s immediate return. So therefore, in their minds, any type of serious resistance to modern day American tyranny in essence becomes in their minds an anti-Christian attempt to thwart the revealed will of God, potentially blocking the culmination of world history through the emergence of the end times.

Modern day prophets abound, and are accepted without any attempt to prove their words or judge their prophecies’ validity. They say they are Christian prophets, and nobody is allowed to question their contention, even after their prophecies fail to come to pass—a sure sign of a false prophet. Almost all these prophets lead the faithful in only one direction—to sit back, not to resist current day evil, and to let God play out “his will” as he leads us into the emergence of the Anti-Christ as a precursor to the times of tribulation.  Being naturally eager to get to the millennium, Christians hear these words and neglect to form any type of resolve to stand against evil that stands directly in front of them—which can easily be counter-interpreted as the serious sin it is. We allow millions of innocent babies to be slaughtered in the womb—we allow actual communists who seek the destruction of the church to rise to positions of governmental prominence with virtually no resistance, as dispensationalist yet ethically lazy Christians sit back and do nothing to stand against this rise of evil, assuming the rise of the incidence of evil to be the “will of God.”

In America’s colonial days, in the struggle against our British overlords from whom we wrested our independence through force, our founders could have easily determined that the evil dominion of the British foreign empire was the will of God—that the end times were near and our oppression as a Christian nation by the British was the fulfillment of prophecy, and a necessary step towards our final fulfillment in the presence of God. They could have laid back and accepted this interpretation of “the will of God” in their circumstances.

But the Colonialists took a different position—they saw the oppression by the British as a present day offense against all of their Christian principles, and took up arms in order to protect themselves and their progeny against it.  They left the fulfillment of prophecy to God—the only one who knows the exact nature of its timing—and stood on Godly principles in their present day, which is the only time that any of us has in which to do the good and the right.

During the run up to the war between the American Colonists and the British, the Colonists attended Christian churches where ministers wore their ministerial vestments over their colonial military uniforms, shedding their vestments after the service, and in colonial war uniform proceeded to seek conscripts from their very own parishioners to take up arms against and to kill the British soldiers in order to secure American freedom.

American Christians claim to revere the brave colonialists, who lit the fire of the American liberty that has advantaged Americans with religious freedom for over two centuries. Yet as today’s American patriots seek to imitate their ancestors in bravery and action, it is now in large part today’s marginally Christian church that stands in the way the most—revering the Colonists in word but not in deed—refusing any such courageous defense of righteousness—instead turning to their own questionable prophets in a misguided attempt to understand the nature of our times and our position in the history of God’s created world, awaiting the future glory with no sense of present day Christian responsibility.

No action that has benefitted the Christian world and the world in general has ever been rooted in inaction and resignation. To sit back and interpret the current rise of evil as the will of God—suggesting that to stand against it with arms would be a great sin and in some way un-Christlike—leaves the world without the Christian counterbalance that has always been necessary to set it right again. Christian America took up arms against the Nazis and prevailed through a significant use of physical violence. It would have been easy to simply cite the rise of Hitler as a sign of the general rise of evil predicted in the Bible for the end times, and to have sat idly by in inaction, afraid of possibly standing against the will of God. But American Christians decided instead to stand in the defense of European Jews and the general citizens of the threatened European nations, and initiated a violent physical campaign to stop the unrighteous oppression, which they knew to be an inherent evil.

No man knows the hour that the culmination of world history will start with the Tribulation. To try to time this occurrence, to claim a certain understanding of its context and coming, and to refuse therefore to act in the meantime as the savoring salt in our society and our world, is in essence a wholly selfish modern act cloaked in the guise of Christianity. It seems ultimately to suggest: “the less good that I do now, potentially the more quickly I will make it to heaven.” It is an attitude claimed by many Christians, but from a place far removed from the practice of actual Christian ethics and morals. It is a lazy, smug form of Christianity, and stands as a major impediment against the undertaking of a righteous resistance against today’s evil overtaking us.

More in line with both Christian principles and the American ethic would be to battle against evil in all its forms, everywhere it occurs within our purview. More wise indeed would be to commit to standing forcefully against evil in our day, as standing for good against evil has always been supported by God. In Ecclesiastes 3, God states that “there is a time to kill, and a time to heal, a time to love and a time to hate, a time for war and a time for peace.” Most of today’s modern Christians only accept half of these biblical proclamations, rejecting the other half as being somehow “un-Christlike.” As if God the Father was not in accord with his son when he inspired those biblical words. As if it is was the Father’s idea, and the soft and solely merciful Son disagreed!

I for one intend to act in defense of those heading to certain terrible oppression and persecution at the hands of our enemies, both within and outside of our borders. I call on all my fellow Christians to stand up for what is right and against all that is unrighteous. Do not succumb to any philosophy that tends to lull you to sleep, effectively keeping you from entering the fray as we seek to save our civilization. No one knows the Biblical timing of the end times with certainty. To act as if you do, and to therefore fail to defend civilization because you see its downfall to be the will of God, is a serious error and may indeed lead to the neglectful destruction of one of the greatest societal gifts from God in the history of man.

God historically has changed his mind many times when his people did what was right, and granted a reprieve against the terrible judgement that he had planned. Who is to say that he might not be moved by our attempts to protect our innocent fellow citizens, both the living and the pre-born, and to re-institute his principles again over our nation, extending the arc of history out in reaction to our righteous comprehensive defense of all that is right and good?

This is where I will place my bet, not on Christian fatalism nor a selfish dispensationalist stand.

American Renewal

texas_eaa20317-0cba-41c4-ba3d-b568ead22f64

Secession — A Fatal Error

In the midst of the current conversation regarding possible solutions to America’s deepening political divide, secession of certain states has been suggested as a way to allow Americans with disparate world views and concepts of governance to live in peace within the same national borders. I would contend that this solution would cause far more tragic consequences than those problems it might alleviate.

States like Texas, with its long politically and culturally conservative tradition, have spoken of leaving the union that no longer represents their beliefs. California, Oregon, and Washington spoke of seceding in 2020 had Trump been re-elected. (In today’s America, actually winning a majority of the electoral college votes no longer assures re-election—therefore their threat of secession proved unnecessary.)

If the goal of some is to gain the ability to live their collective lives separately in a secure environment that allows for a fuller expression of their beliefs—this goal cannot ultimately be successfully attained long term via secession. One has to think on a global scale when considering the makeup and security of the American Republic, and when devising means to resolve our political differences.

With the current state of global competition between contending cultural and political philosophies, such as the enmity between democratic nations and totalitarian states, it must be recognized that the balance of power is at approximate parity. Any shift in this balance of power will render the United States susceptible to challenge and potential attack. At the very least should the U.S. be weakened sufficiently, our enemies would be emboldened to attack our friends and interests in other areas of the world. Without a strong, united national economy, with its resultant large tax base and subsequent significant defense spending, there would exist no way to remain a nation with sufficient power to deter our enemies, who are multiplying and growing ever stronger. We would simply not have sufficient funds in the treasury left over to finance our own defense adequately nor that of our friends throughout the world. This would allow the well financed and cohesive People’s Republic of China to gain final military hegemony and begin to impose their totalitarian will across the globe, putting our nation and others at grave risk of final invasion and subjugation. Under this scenario, secession would serve as the nail in the national coffin of the United States, weakening her sufficiently to bring to a certainty such calamity.

As in the American Civil War, the national bond must be forcefully maintained for our combined strength and our very existence to be ensured. And as in that great war, should force be necessary to prevent the secession of some states and the resultant weakening of our nation, it will be warranted and wise to exercise it.  This includes California, and as strange as it might sound to American conservatives, it also must apply to Texas. Should any state seek to leave; they must be prevented from doing so. Imagine California or Texas, two of our largest state contributors to the national treasury, leaving and removing their tax revenue contribution to the national budget. This single state secession would relegate the United States to second tier nation status, changing the balance of power quickly and sufficiently to tip the scales to the strong advantage of China, that behemoth that enslaves their own citizens, puts unwanted portions of their population in concentration camps, where Chinese men rape the captive women in order to dilute their racial identities, in what in essence constitutes a genocide. Should a nation of this character hold the dominant position in the world, millions of people will be subjugated and countless more killed. All from one simple act of thoughtless state secession in the United States. It must not be allowed.

A far better solution, though daunting and fraught with complications and danger, yet potentially yielding actual long term substantial advantage, would be the specter of a direct civil conflict in the United States to resolve these now irreconcilable differences. Should the right ultimately prevail in this struggle, we would retain the ability to keep the Union intact, while gaining the power to impose our form of traditional American values and governance on those Americans who seek the destruction of these traditions, thus fulfilling our dreams and prayers to renew our great country.  Then from this renewed position of strength, we would retain the ability to protect our national treasury, and to therefore maintain our ability to prevent evil forces in the world from attaining sufficient power to impose their systems of grief and misery on the world. We could put a final end to the slaughter of millions of unborn American citizens, and stop this genocidal stain on our great land. We would gain the political power to regulate our borders, thus protecting the job prospects of millions of Americans. We could put an end once and for all to the misuse of political office for private gain. We would reign in our fiscal spending and cease ridiculous government “welfare” programs, thus avoiding looming financial calamities that regularly have befallen us.

Secession would be a tragic mistake. It would effectively speed our national demise. With the recent cementing of hard leftist control in our government, and the continued propagandizing of our population against our history, traditions, and traditional form of governance, and with the nascent ability of the Democrats to strip conservatives of their political representation through voter fraud, there is no remaining political solution to renew our great land. We must resist with sufficient force to enable real change and foster our national renewal.

History will write our story, recording whether we oversaw the demise of our great land in our time and on our watch, or whether we mustered the courage and made the sacrifices necessary to save America for now and for future generations. We have the opportunity and ability to make this generation the greatest in American history, surpassing the foresight and courage even of our founding generation and the World War II generation. This we must do, and this we will do with God’s help and direction. Stand with us—help us wrest our country back and ensure our safety and the continuation of our great society in perpetuity.

American Renewal

_two_people_facing_each_other_head_to_head_close_up_eb2b40f9-7259-4c5f-9f40-06f555dee153

Declaration Of Irreconcilable Differences

The True RightThe Hard Left
Dedicated to religious freedomDedicated to criminalizing traditional American religious tenets and stripping the right to express them
Dedicated to unfettered free speechDedicated to criminalizing speech they disagree with
Dedicated to the right to own defensive weaponsDedicated to stripping the right to own defensive weapons, leaving Americans totally dependent on government for their safety
Dedicated to defending the lives of the unbornDedicated to the selective slaughter of the unborn
Dedicated to judging others according to character, irrespective of raceDedicated to judging others according to race, irrespective of character.
Dedicated to free and fair electionsDedicated to stealing elections through fraud, disenfranchising those with opposing views
Dedicated to strong economic conditions under which all Americans may succeedDedicated to collapsing the economy in order to impoverish Americans, forcing them thus to accept a totalitarian socialist form of government for support in desperation.
Dedicated to ensuring a strong national defenseDedicated to weakening our national defense, thus making our citizens and allies vulnerable to foreign enemies who are philosophically and politically aligned with the Hard Left.
Dedicated to strong and secure national bordersDedicated to leaving our borders open to Latin American populations that traditionally initially vote Democrat at a 70% rate, regardless of the resultant loss of job opportunities for American citizens
Dedicated to reverence for our Founding Fathers and to our Constitution in its original contextDedicated to slandering the intentions and actions or our Founding Fathers, and to re-interpreting our Constitution, rendering its original meanings unrecognizable.
Dedicated to our founding American principles and long standing religious traditionsDedicated to the destruction of American principles and traditions, seeking to replace them with a new “social justice” religion, substituting tenets invented by man, for other than uniformly ethical reasons

The Hard Left seeks to impose on us a way of life and form of government that is antithetical to our culture, history, and founding principles. They have shown time and time again their willingness to use the power of government to attack conservatives, and appear to be quite willing and eager to employ armed members of the government and military to suppress us, knowing that if they can succeed in this effort, there is no other bulwark remaining to prevent the final destruction of our great country at their hands.

In the 2020 elections, the hard left orchestrated a successful election fraud in order to unlawfully and unethically regain political power, effectively disenfranchising half of the country, stripping us of our right to participate in the democratic process.  With their newfound power, it is certain that their attempts to legally, culturally, and physically marginalize us will intensify, and that they will solidify their election fraud methodology while in power in order to make our subjugation permanent. Communists historically have culturally marginalized, imprisoned, and eventually murdered their vanquished political opponents. There is no reason to think that in time our treatment at their hands will be any different should we lose this great fight. We are in a battle for our very survival at the hands of our philosophical and political enemies. They have stolen most everything precious to us as we slept. Now as we shake off our deadly slumber, fully awaken and act resolutely in defense of our lives, they will be the ones who feel fear, as should any internal or external foe who seeks to subvert and destroy our great American republic.

In light of their tyranny, and with full American hearts and total resolve, we declare our mortal enmity for the positions of the Hard Left—for their leaders and members who hold these subversive positions, and for the Democratic Party itself, which has fully adopted their subversive philosophies, intentions, and policies. We set our faces against their purposes, and their intended subjugation of our people. We declare them mortal enemies, and dedicate our lives to their complete and utter defeat by whatever means necessary, and to the complete renewal of our country.

The hard left that now controls our culture and government, seeking to marginalize, disenfranchise, and eventually imprison us, will never give up willingly. They have billionaire donors and foundations (Ford, Rockefeller, Open Society) that plot against average Americans, spending hundreds of millions of dollars every year to invent and carry out ways to subvert that which we traditionally believe in, to reposition and tighten the political and legal noose around our necks, and to constantly further their relentless destruction of our society. Regardless of their plotting, regardless of their devious intelligence, technological prowess, and the massive riches supporting their subversion, there is a certain glorious and greater power living in the heart of any man or woman who sees the right, the just, and the good, and commits their very being to the protection of such. There is no defeating such a band of Americans, no matter how long the odds! The outcome of this epic coming struggle will turn on the character, courage, and commitment of those who believe in America as she was founded. We can and we will save our nation, and then as a result of our re-established national power and focus, we will turn our attention to liberating the entire world from the forces of the hard left that seek to enslave them, or in the case of some regimes, have already done so. We seek the total destruction of the communist system and the bringing to justice of its leaders worldwide.  

We call on our brothers in all U.S. military branches, police departments, and armed agencies of the government to honestly evaluate how you can best fulfill your oath to our beloved Constitution in the coming conflict. Your oath is not to a President, nor to a political party—but to our beloved Constitution in it’s original intent—and to the country which was founded based on these pillars. We are your brothers, your uncles, your fathers, and your grandfathers. We seek no personal gain; only a return to the safety and prosperity inherent in our original American system, and to the right to raise our families in traditional American freedom and moral structure. We intend to perform a hard reset in America—to tear out the destructive root that is communism, and to try the leaders of the Hard Left in honest and traditional courts of law, and where found guilty of sedition against our country, to imprison them, and in extreme cases execute them for their demonic attempts to subvert and destroy our great nation. We intend to strip them of their destructive influence in our government, media, courts, and schools.  We intend to banish from our government anyone—Republican, Democrat, or Independent—who has enriched themselves at the trough of our enemy China to the detriment of our country.  Many have done so at the expense of America, as they have effectively aided and abetted our clear and mortal enemy, putting their personal financial enrichment ahead of the welfare and safety of their fellow American citizens. We intend to bring back equal treatment under the law, respect for the traditional tenets undergirding our Constitution, and for the Constitution itself according to its original intent and context. We pledge to you that in the new government that emerges, your loyalty to our constitution will be remembered. Respect for your service and for your sacrifices will be enshrined. We pledge to close most federal government agencies, as they have become simply conduits for leftist propaganda and policies, and have served as channels of government overreach and over spending.  With a portion of the monies saved, we intend to augment the pay of all military members and police officers a full 10% across the board, in order to adjust the level of well being of yourselves and your families, making it closer to commensurate with the sacrifices you willingly make for us all. We seek your well being and your prosperity, as you have selflessly chosen to place yourselves as protectors between the American public and great harm. You have been our heroes historically, and most of you will be once again in this coming conflict. We call on you anew to play your crucial part in the protection and renewal of this great country! Should any of you lose your employment due to your support for our attempts to renew our land, this 10% pay increase will apply retroactively to the date of your employment termination by our subverted government,

On the other hand, we will remember all those in military, police, and government agency service who refuse to honor their oath to our original constitution, and instead stand with arms on the side of the hard left against our American republic. This will be more than sufficient cause to then begin their expulsion from current and future military, government, and police service, and will expose such traitors to the possibility of incarceration or deportation. Fighting with arms against those struggling to re-institute our traditional American Republic will not be regarded lightly, and will not soon be forgotten. It would be better to have never been born an American than to serve in our military, police, or government agencies and fight against her original constitution and founding principles, and against those American patriots risking it all in order to salvage our country.

Soon to be written is either the bitter closing chapter of the United States as a constitutional republic, should we shirk our duty—or a grand new chapter in the renewal of our great land if we accept this solemn responsibility. Heroes and traitors will emerge and then be recorded in the history written of this time, to then be lauded or cursed for centuries thereafter. 

There is no honor in supporting those seeking the destruction of our great American traditions, founding principles, and developed form of government.  The history of the hard left is one of great oppression and murder. How much better to stand against them as a true hero, as one who stood resolutely for what is eternally right and just, and for the proven form of government that has been the envy of the world for over two centuries? How much better to stand in protection of our traditional constitutional system of governance, which has wrought more freedom for its citizens than any other in the history of mankind? How much better to stand and fight with a grand resolve against the forces of the hard left that seek to destroy all that is sacred and good in our traditional culture and form of government?

It is well within our power to save this great American republic, if we simply recognize and wield this awesome power residing within us. We stand as effectively the greatest standing army in the history of the world as armed and patriotic Americans. Should we make together this great leap of faith, and then stand resolutely against the rushing tide—we shall indeed prevail and renew our great America.  She will then stand strong and proud for centuries to come, and will be a continuing force for great good in our world! This will happen because of our commitment and courage in defense of our homeland, which will be written of and spoken about for centuries to come. This is our fight—this is our time! Stand with us.

American Renewal

military_7e92b737-5470-4573-a585-42949c175b5d

The Case For Christian Militancy

In the year 1070, when Pope Urban II heard the cries of the Greek Christians in their communiqués to the Pope, testifying of their terror as their fellow citizens were raped, crucified, and beheaded at the hands of the Muslim forces as they invaded traditional Christian lands— Pope Urban heard their cries. Were the Crusaders, whose force he raised to stop the atrocities, committing sin when they pursued and slew the Muslims with their swords? Would it have been more righteous to allow the rape and slaughter of the Greek Christians to continue? Would it have been a better example of Christian teaching to simply turn the other cheek?

When Christ entered Jerusalem on the back of a donkey, the people spread palm branches on the ground in reverence.  The very first thing Jesus did when he dismounted was to fashion a whip with his own hands—an act that would take a determined amount of time and effort—and proceeded to drive the moneychangers out of the sacred temple, overturning all the tables of the moneychangers and those selling doves for sacrifice. It is quite probable that what drove them out of the temple was the sting of Christ’s whip on their physical bodies. Was Jesus just caught up in a moment of sinful anger and violence? The Bible teaches us that he was indeed without sin and blameless. How else could he have served as a worthy sacrificial offering sufficient for the atonement of the whole world? Would it have been a better example of his love to simply turn away at the offense or offer a non-violent rebuke? Christ chose righteous violence to right a wrong. Are we therefore necessarily to choose a different path than Jesus Christ did to right a grievous wrong we are faced with—or are we indeed free at times to imitate a portion of Christ’s character that he exhibited that particular day?

When the National Socialist Adolph Hitler and his armies invaded Europe, seeking to subjugate the continent, clearly intending to slaughter all the Jews of Europe—were allied soldiers who shot at German soldiers with the intent of killing them sinning in the eyes of God? I say no, but that they were indeed committing a righteous act in defense of innocent life, to ensure the freedom of an entire continent, through the difficult and dangerous process of using violence to thwart an intended evil outcome.

When communist North Vietnam invaded South Vietnam, seeking to subjugate the freedom loving people there, to enslave them under a communist regime—were South Vietnamese and American soldiers sinning when they sought to kill these invading forces in order to protect the innocent freedom loving South Vietnamese people? After the U.S. military withdrawal, effectively abandoning the South to their fate, the North imprisoned over 1,000,000 South Vietnamese citizens in re-education camps, shooting or starving to death 168,000. Was killing those North Vietnamese soldiers as an initial reaction to their clear threat to innocent life a sin? Would it have been more righteous to do nothing in response to their invasion? And in the end, was retreating and abandoning the South to communism—with all its attendant death and torture—rightly defined as righteousness or as sin?

Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who along with Vladimir Bukovsky co-founded the Soviet dissident movement, exposed the horrible abuse of political prisoners in the Soviet socialist prison system in his masterpiece work The Gulag Archipelago. In it he mused “And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: “what would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?” Would the Russian citizens have been justified had they found the wisdom, courage, and resolve to resist the Bolsheviks with weapons? Would it have been wise and honorable to fight back with weapons to prevent the final body count of 20,000,000 Soviet citizens ultimately murdered by the communist regime thereafter? Or was it more righteous to simply do nothing, as the Russian citizens did, leaving the communists to consolidate power and begin the extermination?

This is the seminal decision you will make in this war to save America from communism, in this fight to prevent our personal subjugation, and then to finally renew our great country—would fighting with physical force on our own shores against this evil be in itself an evil act, or would it be better to allow our great country to descend into communism, with all the millions of attendant killings historically always present under such regimes, in order to avoid the violence of resisting, considering such resistance immoral?

Your answer to this seminal question will determine the fate of our country, and of your family and friends. Will they live free, or will they be subjugated? Make no mistake—the hard left forces coalescing in our government and society seek the stripping of our freedom to worship, to speak freely, and to own a defensive firearm.  As all communists before them, they seek to disarm, then torture and imprison all those who stand against them should they amass sufficient power. Will you allow this to happen on your watch? Do you consider yourself morally free to resist with arms such a cohort that plans to foist such atrocities on you, your family, your friends, and your church?

This is our moment in the history of the world to rise up with firm resolve and fight this great fight. This is our Battle of the Bulge—this is our Gates of Vienna moment. Once we answer this seminal question correctly—is it justified to fight and kill in defense of the innocent, to preserve beauty and righteousness, and to prevent certain and terrible suffering—we can then successfully move forward to overcome our enemies within and without, and to renew our great land. We are at war, whether we acknowledge it or not. It is a war declared against us by the hard left in their decades long attempt to destroy the society within which we live, to strip us of our constitutional protections, and subject us to a totalitarian socialist state. We must resist, and not only resist—we must decisively prevail! We must declare ourselves at war and take action, before our enemy becomes too entrenched and powerful to overcome.  Should this happen, simply read the history of other historical socialist regimes to understand the future for yourself and your family under such a planned system of oppression.

The great political philosopher Thomas Sowell stated: “If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.”  There are no third choices in this conflict. Which will you choose? Will you choose courage and stand against oppression, or will you shrink away in indecision, leaving the outcome to our more determined enemies? Or will you actually go so far as to stand with the left as an oppressor against the constitutional rights of your fellow citizens?

I for one will stand against such oppression, and with arms if necessary, in the defense of the constitutional rights of my fellow Americans, in defense of our traditional moral and religious precepts, and in the renewal of our founding American experience. I urge you to join me.

American Renewal

afghanistan_5170086c-588a-4102-8973-4f3d11897942

Afghanistan—Cui Bono?

I hear constant incredulous reactions to the actions of the Biden Administration that have created the horrible situation we find ourselves in in Afghanistan. Our citizens left behind, held hostage for political and financial gain by the Taliban, and subject to the worst of potential outcomes with torture and retributive murder in the traditional horrendous forms of the Taliban.

In early September 2021 on FOX News, host Julie Banderas of the Faulkner Focus interviewed Senator Joni Ernst. Ernst reacted to the Biden Administration negotiating with the Taliban terror organization while Americans were left behind in country at their mercy, abandoned by our military leadership. Ernst said that for Biden to entrust the Taliban is “ludicrous.” She added that she “doesn’t know what President Biden is thinking” by relying on the radical Islamist organization. “I don’t know what President Biden is thinking, and the fact that we allowed the country to fall quickly to the Taliban and not evacuate our American citizens and our Afghan partners is reprehensible.”

Former President Donald Trump, during a rally in Georgia recently, called the Afghanistan withdrawal stupid and incompetent. Sean Hannity recently called Biden incompetent.

And therein lies the problem—Ernst, Trump, and Hannity do not know what Biden is thinking—they don’t understand the true motivations for the disastrous manner in which we pulled out of Afghanistan. An American Senator, a former American President, and a famous conservative talk show host who have clearly not been able to ascertain the base motivations of the hard left in American politics, and can therefore not fully understand their policies and actions, lacking the base understanding from which one can truly understand and then intelligently push back hard with a clear eyed vision against the purposely destructive actions of the left. Ernst, Trump, and Hannity, along with the majority of Republicans in government, have absolutely no idea why Biden and our military leaders are doing what they are doing, and are therefore forced to blindly attribute his actions and those of our military leadership to ineptitude, incompetence, or senility, all of which have absolutely nothing to do with the underlying nature of and the actual reasoning for their actions.

The Latin phrase cui bono—to whose benefit—is always a reliable guide to understanding the ruling motivations of those whose actions seem strange and incongruous in light of the situation. Human beings make decisions and take actions solely to further their desired results, in order to arrive at a conclusion more suitable to the furtherance of their desires and goals. Senator Ernst, former President Trump, and Sean Hannity would be wise to more fully utilize this guiding phrase, and to work their way back intellectually, following the thread of leftist thought and activity through the last century to its clear expression in the current actions of the American left, in order to arrive at a more accurate picture of Biden and the hard left’s actions and intentions relative to the Afghanistan debacle.

Joe Biden was an American senator during the Vietnam War, a war meant to protect our South Vietnamese ally against the communist North Vietnamese army and their attempts to defeat and subjugate the free South. The North sought to overwhelm the South militarily and unify all of Vietnam under a totalitarian communist governmental structure.  The South clung to their supportive alliance with the U.S., seeking to ensure that their country and people might remain free. When President Ford, under tremendous political pressure from Soviet organized American national protests, ordered our military withdrawal from Vietnam, he promised continued military aid in order to allow the South to fight the communists themselves.  But then Senator Joe Biden and other leftist members of congress moved to cut off defensive aid to the South and left the South to defend against the communist North by themselves with little equipment nor ammunition sufficient for the fight. The American government promised to provide defensive aid as we pulled our military out of the country, yet leftist members of congress forced the cutoff of our financial support, leaving the South at the total mercy of the North, which was still heavily funded and armed by the communist Soviet Union and Communist China. President Ford went to Congress after this withdrawal and subsequent U.S. abandonment of the South to simply seek funding to evacuate our citizens and allies, but was opposed by Biden and others in congress. Biden stated that he opposed using U.S. forces temporarily to secure the evacuation—but how else was it to be accomplished, if not under the defense umbrella of American force? Ford was then forced to seek funding from private Christian organizations in order to avoid stranding our South Vietnamese allies in the fallen country where they would have been targeted by the communists and slaughtered. Joe Biden then publicly ridiculed the South Vietnamese refugees fleeing the defeat of the South, and withdrew congressional support from these ally refugees attempting to escape to freedom in the United States. Non governmental charitable organizations had to step up to provide the support necessary to sustain these freedom loving refugees whom the American leftists had abandoned to suffer, doing everything possible to make their lives dangerous and miserable. As opposed to the Biden Administration’s current day total support for immigrants from Latin America, who are historically inclined at a 70% rate to vote for his Democratic Party, the South Vietnamese citizens seeking to flee Vietnam would not be so inclined to vote for any leftist American candidate after gaining final U.S. citizenship, having fled similar murderous leftists in Vietnam. Therefore their value was found wanting, and they were treated accordingly.

Now with the phrase cui bono—to whose benefit—firmly in mind, who exactly were Joe Biden and other leftists actually helping by voting in congress to leave the South vulnerable to their eventual physical defeat?  What were they trying to accomplish?  Were they supporting the long standing American tradition of aiding and standing with those who fight against totalitarian regimes in order to maintain their common freedoms? Clearly not. If they had been, net benefit would have then flowed from the United States government to the freedom loving South Vietnamese people. But it did not. Or were they rather standing in support of the world wide communist movement, seeking to support and provide aid to the communists attempting to subjugate a freedom loving people? Within the framework of cui bono their actions were clearly aimed at stranding the freedom loving South Vietnamese, forcing them into subjugation under the communist regime and hindering any fleeing South Vietnamese citizens from finding a safe haven, all of which only provided a net benefit to the communist North.

After our withdrawal and then complete abandonment of the South, the North imprisoned 1,100,000 South Vietnam citizens in re-education camps, eventually working to death, starving, or shooting 168,000 of them, due directly to the actions of leftist U.S. citizens who promoted anti-war demonstrations—forcing our military withdrawal—and leftist members of congress who then withdrew our remaining financial support for the South and her fleeing citizens. These same leftist members of congress then said nothing about the subsequent slaughter. Cui bono—to whose benefit—instructs us clearly as to which side these Senators were actually on.

Now in the current case of Afghanistan, if any member of the American government were inclined to support our traditional ideal of fighting terrorism and protecting Americans from being terrorized, would they then seek to abandon America citizens to the mercy of those who are committed to institutionalizing such terror and oppression? For whose benefit—cui bono—would any American president withdraw our military while Americans were still in country and then abandon these American citizens to the mercies of the Taliban terrorists? For whose benefit would any American administration abandon a fully functioning Bagram Air Base near the Chinese border to be abandoned and therefore not remain a functioning asset in any future conflict with Communist China, but instead to fall into Chinese hands as it already quickly has, and then to potentially be used against us in a future war?

The actions of the Biden Administration officials and military leaders were clearly not meant to protect American lives, values, and interests in Afghanistan. The resultant benefit of their actions flowed directly to the Taliban and to China, whose benefit the administration clearly sought over the welfare of American citizens and our allies. For those with eyes to see the reality of the situation, it is clear that this administration has abandoned their duty to support and protect America and her citizens, favoring those devoted to terrorizing, attacking, and eventually breaking down our society. But for what ultimate reason would they do this?

The leftist Barack Obama was mentored by a man named Frank Marshall Davis, who was at the time on an F.B.I. watch list for those who were to be immediately arrested in case of war with the communist Soviet Union This fact strongly suggested that Marshall had led the F.B.I. to believe that he would actively aid and abet our communist enemy during a potential war. Obama never denied his relationship with Marshall, but rather confirmed it in his book Dreams from my Father, and never disavowed Marshall’s communist position nor the communist positions of his own declared Kenyan father and American mother.

When Obama became president, he carried out a purge of hundreds of generals and flag officers who were not ideologically aligned with his leftist beliefs, and replaced them with those who were so inclined. Hence we have a military leadership now in place that will generally tow the leftist political line. This same political leadership has accepted Biden’s policies and actions in Afghanistan by pulling out our troops and leaving our citizens and allies at the mercy of our sworn enemies. Cui bono? Clearly to the benefit of our Taliban enemy, but there is more to the story, more peeling of the onion to be done.

Joe Biden is hardly without his communist connections. His initial Senate campaign was financed by the Council for a Livable World, which was later shown to be a Soviet communist initiated and financed organization.

In e.mails gleaned from the Hunter Biden laptop, Joe used the name Peter Henderson, not his own. Henderson was a character in Tom Clancy novels who was a senate aid who then became a Soviet K.G.B. agent. Now what could possibly prompt Biden to use the name of a Soviet spy as his own?

Antonio Gramsci was the leader of the Italian Communist Party at the time of Stalin. Inspired by the success of the Bolshevik Revolution, Gramsci sought to foment a similar revolution in his native Italy but failed miserably and was imprisoned for 20 years for his efforts to subvert the Italian government. During his incarceration he sought to understand the reasonings for his failure and to find remedies to be employed by future communists in the overthrow of Western democracies, focusing primarily on the United States. He surmised that the Italian government was impervious to overthrow because of the cultural institutions that served as its pillars of support—the church, the courts, the educational system, the military, and the Italian family. He suggested that if these institutions had been torn down ahead of time it would have destroyed the foundational pillars of the Italian government, effectively allowing it’s overthrow. He then surmised that such targeted future attacks on the pillars of any Western government could lead to its overthrow, including that of the United States.

Traditionally in America since the inception of the communist ideal introduced by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in their 1848 pamphlet The Communist Manifesto, the American left and the Communist Party USA had sought violent revolution as the sole means to overthrowing the U.S. government and to convert our traditional governmental system into a communist state. But as in the times of Gramsci in Italy, these attempts failed miserably due to the same supportive institutions holding up the American government. A new framework and strategy was in order in their consideration of American overthrow, and the American left turned to the teachings of Antonio Gramsci.

When it became clear that the communist Soviet Union was slaughtering its own citizens to the tune of 30,000,000 human souls who would not acquiesce to the communist ideal, it became a terrible branding problem for American communists. How could they effectively rail against the oppression by the ruling class when the Russian government had been overthrown by a violent communist revolution purportedly to reverse this oppression, and then this revolutionary regime proceeded to oppress and murder in ways rarely seen before in human history? Clearly a rebranding was in order if their communist beliefs were to be held in any regard in the U.S.  So traditional American communists formed a new movement, calling it the New Left, attempting to separate themselves from the Old Left and its slaughters, and formed an organization to represent its tenets, calling it Students for a Democratic Society, or SDS. Their founding manifesto the Port Huron Statement attempted to maintain communist ideals and policies while deftly distancing themselves from the U.S.S.R., which served as a horrible reminder of what communist policies actually yield in any society when instituted. It was a classic rebranding and propaganda campaign and not in any way an actual renunciation or change of heart in regards to communism—only an attempt at a change in public perception to minimize resistance, and in leftist strategy as to how to accomplish their desired revolution.

So a complete rebranding and redirecting of their entire strategy was carried out. Separating themselves from the clearly also communist Soviet Union and turning to the strategies of Antonio Gramsci, the New Left set their sights on the destruction of every supportive institution holding up American society and the American government. Communist West German student movement leader Rudi Dutschke coined the term “the long march through the institutions” to explain the teachings of Gramsci and their application by the left in their approach towards America and other Western democracies.

When we look back to the actions of the Biden Administration in Afghanistan, withdrawing our military while withdrawing air and logistical support for the remaining Afghan national army and stranding at minimum hundreds of American citizens—cui bono? Well certainly the orthodox Muslim forces benefitted. But why would an American leftist want the benefit to accrue to such forces? Acting in this way strengthened a stated enemy of the U.S., and how could this benefit the Biden Administration? The phrase “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” comes immediately to mind. Since the American left has been traditionally and is still to this day committed to the breakdown of all supportive American institutions, would not any enemy of any American institution be at least their temporary friend? Which institutions suffered because of the Biden Administration’s actions and in what way might that be of benefit to our enemies?

First of all the American military suffered greatly, demoralized badly at the wasting of their member’s lives in defense of Afghanistan, and at being prevented from officially initiating rescue missions for American citizens, effectively leaving them behind to their fate at the hands of the Taliban.  This clearly disillusioned military members, and will subsequently hinder recruitment into the American military and encourage early retirements. Therefore, one of Gramsci’s prescriptions is fulfilled—the weakening of the American military. This is the clear answer to cui bono. What American man or woman now wants to serve in a military that leaves its members behind at the mercy of our enemies? Military enrollment will plummet subsequently, which clearly aids both our orthodox Muslim enemies, and our traditional enemies throughout the communist world, as they will be relatively strengthened militarily in relation to the U.S. and emboldened to spread their destructive forms of government relatively unopposed.

But what other benefit accrues to the “long march through the institutions” by the Biden Administration’s actions? The demoralization of the American public in general certainly comes to mind. The American people and our military have always committed to never leaving our people behind subject to harm in foreign countries. Now the Biden Administration has forced the realization on the American public—we now indeed do leave Americans behind at the mercy of our enemies. And this has cut at the resolve and pride of the American public and caused a widespread state of demoralization.

Yuri Bezmenov, a high level Soviet defector to the United States, stated that one of the goals of the worldwide communist movement is to demoralize a target society in order to weaken it and hasten its overthrow. If the New Left in America is indeed using the playbook of Antonio Gramsci, seeking to further the long march through American foundational institutions—breaking down the moral strength and resolve of those inhabiting these institutions—would not the current actions relative to Afghanistan be a clear furtherance of this agenda? Would not the question of cui bono be therefore effectively answered? And because the left now controls the levers of the democratic vote in America—through ballot harvesting, mailing ballots to deceased citizens and those who did not request them, and then sending their operatives to collect these ballots and fill them in with their leftist candidate’s name without fear of an identification requirement—why should they care that they are operating so brazenly in their long march? There is no counterbalancing political force for them to now be concerned with—they effectively control the voting process, silencing just enough opposing voices from democratic representation in order to win elections and maintain control.

The key to wisdom is understanding the base motivations of all involved in any equation. Fully understanding their reasonings is the primary requisite regardless if these reasonings are clearly and honestly stated, partially obfuscated dishonestly, or entirely hidden by carefully crafted propaganda.

I would posit that the Biden Administration, being now an extension of the New Left in America—fully supporting and benefitting historically communist regimes and the enemies of the U.S.—considers all of their actions through the lens of Gramscian political philosophy—how can our policies and actions further the long march through the institutions that uphold American society and government in order to ultimately accomplish their destruction?

This is the prism through which any clear eyed person must comprehensively evaluate actions by this or any other hard leftist administration. I offer this lens through which to view the actions of today’s Biden administration, as opposed to the naïveté that pervades the analysis of those such as Senator Ernst, former President Trump, and Sean Hannity—who offer us nothing fully useful in their analysis of our actual national predicament, but only further our national confusion, clouding our vision and obscuring our true path forward.

American Renewal

world_war_II_9bafadbb-8732-4cda-8074-a89149ebb050

The Coventry Principle And Civil War

During World War II, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill received intelligence that the English city of Coventry, an industrial center important to the production of British war materiel, was quite soon to be bombed by the Germans. Since the intelligence had been derived from German communications via secret code, and the British had recently gained the ability to decipher the German code, Churchill did not want to alert the Germans that their code had been broken, and chose instead to leave Coventry uninformed and lightly defended against attack. 554 British citizens were killed in the subsequent bombing.  Churchill was prepared to accept this short term loss of life in order to maintain the secret British ability to decipher German communications and so to ultimately win the war, avoiding much greater prolonged bloodshed and loss of life.  This utilitarian view of the death of his own countrymen begs the question—is it justified to sacrifice lives in the short term in order to most certainly save many more lives in the long term?

My English father was MI5 during WWII. Embedded with standard troops while positioned in the English Channel on a troop transport ship, an identical transport ship close by was torpedoed by a German U-boat. As the ship sank, dumping hundreds of British soldiers into the frigid waters, they cried out for the captain of my father’s ship to save them. The captain, knowing his ship to be still a live target for the Nazi U-boat, and that they were already overloaded and could not take more passengers on without risking the capsizing of his own ship and the death of his own men also, turned and motored away from the drowning men and towards the original destination. All the hundreds of men left floating in the frigid English Channel died that day. It traumatized my father for the rest of his life, remembering the cries for help from his countrymen.

Was the captain justified in his decision to secure the lives under his command, while neglecting the lives of the men from the other boat that he actually could not effectively save? If he had responded to the men’s cries and attempted a rescue, and had lost his men as well as those from the other ship that day, would he have been considered a better man in the sight of the families of the at risk men, or in the hindsight of recorded history?

In life and in human conflict, rational yet difficult decisions that men do not want to make, must be made. The greatest net human benefit must be the strongest guiding factor in these decisions. Morally correct yet tortuous decisions must be made under pressure, as the lesser of two evils must be chosen with courage, during careful pre-planning and also quickly under great pressure, in order to arrive at the most benevolent net result. Though these decisions may haunt their makers, the memory of doing right under enormous pressure endures. If allowed to take hold, a sense of personal forgiveness can emerge and grow in the person burdened with the responsibility of such decisions, replete ultimately with a sense of pride at the exercise of courage—though mixed ultimately with a great and permanent sadness.

In today’s America, her conservatives, who adhere to our traditional moral and ethical tenets,  must consider our similar and extremely difficult decisions carefully. As the hard left continues to align themselves with historic and current day regimes that have and do today enslave their citizens, stripping their God given rights, murdering and oppressing them—what is to be done? How must we prevent this calamity from befalling us? What is the difficult but morally correct decision to be made in response? How will we ensure that the hard left in America will not follow their philosophical brethren in their murderous ends, as has every truly socialist regime in history?  How also will we prevent them from not only oppressing and murdering us as political adversaries, but from also continuing to slaughter 900,000 of our most vulnerable emerging citizens every single year in the womb?

It has become quite clear that a political solution is no longer available to us, as the hard left has perfected techniques to alter the national vote to their liking, rendering us unable to affect the American situation through political participation, though many conservatives refuse to recognize this reality. It is also quite clear that the Supreme Court has been bullied into submission by the left and their violent threats, and have not and will not, in many seminal instances, stand in defense of our constitutional rights under great leftist political pressure. Therefore I ask, how will we prevent our subjugation and oppression, and the continued slaughter of our precious and innocent unborn children? Are we to assume that the left will break with their long historical pattern of violence against traditionalists? Do we imagine that their bloodlust for the death of the unborn will subside naturally? Do we simply adopt the normalcy bias, hiding our heads and assuming that things will continue on as always, that there is no need to worry, and that no defensive action will be required? All this is folly, and will lead to our certain subjugation and the continued and increasing loss of life at the hands of the left. Make no mistake about it—they dance with demons as they plan our oppression and murder, and as they rejoice in the continued murder of the unborn. They are not of us, as they hate the abiding and just principles that Americans have believed in traditionally. They are no longer our countrymen.

It will bode much better to abandon our defensive position, from whence we can never break out of our current danger, and with full hearts set our country right again. We are in the midst of losing the greatest country in the history of man, letting it go on our historical watch, to our great and eternal shame. We continue to follow false prophets and false hopes that mire us in inaction. If we continue as is, our names will go down in history as those indecisive American cowards, who were given by God the greatest nation in the history of man, yet who could not raise enough righteous concern to protect this gift from destruction.

Should a civil war begin, hundreds of thousands of Americans may die on both sides of the conflict. Yet if we ultimately save through our efforts hundreds of millions of Americans from being subjugated under tyranny, saving millions of them from being imprisoned or killed because of their traditional political beliefs, while at the same time saving the vast majority of the 900,000 yet unborn Americans from being slaughtered in the womb each and every year— can we not assume a civil war initiated to accomplish these righteous aims would be the lesser of two evils, and would in the end be judged a benevolent action?

Churchill made the right choice at Coventry. My father’s captain made the right choice in the English Channel. Do we have the insight, courage, and resolve to make the right choice in our own time in America? I pray that we find this courage in our hearts in time to save her for future generations.

American Renewal

american_police_2d52f7ac-af77-479f-8298-aee7bc626bfc

American Gestapo

Since the 2020 election fraud allowed the Biden Administration to enter the White House through an illicit election, and gain control of the Senate through the same means, many conservatives predicted that the hard left would use these offices to push to permanently silence and marginalize their political foes, thus clearing the way for the institution of a much more authoritarian socialist governmental structure in the U.S. virtually unopposed.

True to these predictions, Joe Biden on April 15, 2021 issued an Executive Order on “Blocking Property With Respect to Specified Harmful Activities of the Government of the Russian Federation.” This presidential executive order allows the leftist government the legal right, without formal legal charge nor court hearing, to decide to accuse American citizens of “colluding with the Russians” and therefore sanction them through the confiscation of their personal property. This clearly is tyranny, as it circumvents the legal channels traditionally needed for the government to confiscate property. The administration can now simply make the accusation, yet is not under compulsion to present evidence, testimony, nor any kind of proof to be adjudicated in a court of law, and there is no recourse to appeal the decision. This leaves conservative opponents of the current hard leftist administration, should they effectively oppose the administration, open to accusations of virtual treason without basis and proof, and the potential loss of their property, for the sole “crime” of resisting the policies and programs of this leftist government. This should send a chill down the spine of every American dedicated to truth, fair play, and our traditional rule of law.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/04/executive_order_canceling_the_constitution.html

In a previous article titled The Right of Rebellion, I elaborated on the left’s use of psychological projection as a deflective tool in their public discourse. Like a minister railing against sexual sin from the pulpit, yet visiting prostitutes on Friday night—hard left Democrats always accuse their political opponents of what they themselves are doing secretly. For years Democrats have railed against Republicans for being “agents of Russia” accusing them of “colluding with Russia,” though zero evidence has been presented to establish these narratives as true. Yet the Biden administration just recently removed all sanctions President Trump had put in place against the Russian Nord Stream natural gas pipeline between Russia and Germany, greatly aiding Russia in her ambitions to control Europe politically. Trump’s previous policy greatly damaged the Russian plan to sell natural gas to Germany and other European allies of America, effectively denying Russia this revenue source, and the resultant outsized political influence over Europe. The shutting off of Russian natural gas supplies to Europe could easily have been used as a controlling political lever in the region. During a hard German winter, just the threat of curtailing the gas supply would be enough to force Germany to submit to Russian political interests against their better judgement. The Trump Administration sought to prevent this potential Russian control over Europe; the Biden Administration has now reversed this policy, enabling this enhanced Russian influence and control.

Clearly the Trump Administration pursued a policy that did in essence weaken Russian political leverage over our European allies, effectively denying Putin and the Russian Federation the ability to fatten their respective coffers, through the U.S. sanctions against the pipeline participants in an attempt to keep the pipeline from coming online. Conversely, the Biden Administration has now strengthened Russia’s political influence over Europe, which effectively weakens American influence in the region, and increases Russian revenues needed to continue to modernize its nuclear weapons arsenal, which is fashioned and built to be used against America and her allies.

The left incessantly accused Trump of being a “Russian agent” while he was in effect working to weaken the Russian position and Russia’s standing in the world. Yet Biden, hiding the results of his policies relative to Russia behind such accusations, and then furthering the deflective propaganda narrative by issuing an executive order designed to accuse and sanction political foes for their supposed subversive ties to Russia, has in effect taken a quite aggressive step to purposely support and strengthen the Russian position in Europe. Trump was attempting to stop the Russian Nord Stream Pipeline in order to keep Europe out of the destructive sphere of control of the Russian Federation, instead opting to forge a plan to have Europe purchase the surplus natural gas produced in the States through recently developed advanced fracking techniques, which would in effect have greatly strengthened our traditional European alliances, and weakened Russia’s influence over them. Were these the actions of a Russian secret agent? Why would such a Russian agent work against the wishes and goals of their patron state? Would not an actual agent of the Russian Federation work in concert with the goals and interests of the Federation, as has done the Biden Administration? Remember, when the minister rails and rails from the pulpit without ceasing against the sexual sin of others, you can be assured that he is an active participant in what he harshly and incessantly accuses others of doing. The Biden Administration strengthens the hand of Russia, and then rails against conservatives for being “Russian agents.”

The Biden Administration, and by extension the American hard left, is actively preferentially pursuing the interests of America’s current enemies; Russia, China, Iran, et al. By constantly accusing others of being “Russian Agents” and then actually inventing unconstitutional property seizure sanctions against those they falsely accuse, they are pushing their deflective narrative into the zone of comprehensive and all encompassing evil, from whence all totalitarian regimes have begun their active oppression of their fellow citizens. It begins with the issuance of edicts that allow non-legal sanctions against political opponents, and ends with suppression of their political enemies with yet even harsher methods, once their opponents are effectively marginalized and silenced. And most often it ends in re-education camps where a substantial percentage of the inmates lose their lives.

I urge all Americans to consider the actual goals and policies of the Biden Administration, not for the purported character that the hard left attributes to them, but for the nature of their true intent, character, and actual practical results. The Biden Administration is actively and provably furthering the interests of the Russian Federation, the Chinese Communist Party, and the Islamic Republic of Iran. All have declared themselves as mortal enemies of our American republic. Who then is rightfully to be considered the actual American subversive?

The overthrow of this and all potential future hard leftist American administrations is our only hope to save our civilization from the dangerous subversion that now lies within. To have fellow American citizens living on our shores that actively pursue our overthrow at the hands of our mortal foreign enemies is a paradigm that can no longer be suffered if we expect to survive as a nation. Enough is enough. Where are the heroes needed for today’s fight? The time is at hand. Stand and make your indelible mark on American history! Inscribe your names on the wall of the brave who have stood in support of American liberty at the risk of their own lives, ensuring the abiding freedom of themselves, their families, and their fellow countrymen. Gather your weapons and let’s prepare ourselves to take back our country and civilization.

American Renewal